The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Oxygen Reduction Reaction on Ruthenium and Rhodium Nanoparticles Modified with Selenium and Sulfur
Open accessAbstract
Oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) was carried out in a sulfuric acid solution saturated with oxygen on Ru and Rh nanoparticles chemically modified with Se or S. Among the four chalcogen-modified specimens examined, the modification of Ru with Se shows the highest activity. [ P. Zelenay et al. , U.S. Pat. Appl. filed Dec. 5, 2005 ]. Therefore, the highlight of this study is the synthesis and use of the Ru ∕ Se catalyst vs the cluster-type Ru x Se y catalysts investigated before, and on providing evidence toward similar reactivity functions between Ru ∕ Se and Ru x Se y . On the nanoparticle Ru ∕ Se electrode, ORR commences at 0.9 V and the diffusion-limiting reduction current is attained at ∼ 0.4 V (vs a reference hydrogen electrode). ORR activity does not decrease in the presence of methanol, showing a full methanol tolerance at methanol concentrations investigated in this study. It is proposed that surface metallic Ru atoms embedded in Se matrices are the catalytic active sites to sustain ORR at a high level. However, the smooth Ru disk surface modified by selenium displays lower activity than a “clean” Ru disk (without Se) and a noticeably lower activity than the nanoparticle Ru ∕ Se . Possible reasons for this behavior are discussed. Finally, a Ru ∕ S catalyst is slightly more active than a H 2 -reduced Ru black catalyst but is much less active than Ru ∕ Se and Ru x Se y , and is also methanol-tolerant at 0.1 M methanol concentrations. Both Se and S reduce ORR rates on Rh.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Methanol oxidation and direct methanol fuel cells: a selective review
Wasmus, S., & Küver, A. (1999) · Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0022-0728(98)00197-1 · Cited by 1,308
Oxygen Reduction on Carbon-Supported Pt−Ni and Pt−Co Alloy Catalysts
Paulus, U. A., Wokaun, A., Scherer, G. G., Schmidt, T. J., Stamenkovic, V., Radmilovic, V., Markovic, N. M., & Ross, P. N. (2002) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp013442l · Cited by 954
Cited by
Recent Advances in Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction
Shao, M., Chang, Q., Dodelet, J.-P., & Chenitz, R. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00462 · Cited by 3,903
Scientific Aspects of Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell Durability and Degradation
Borup, R., Meyers, J., Pivovar, B., Kim, Y. S., Mukundan, R., Garland, N., Myers, D., Wilson, M., Garzon, F., Wood, D., et al. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr050182l · Cited by 3,402
Predicted Trends of Core−Shell Preferences for 132 Late Transition-Metal Binary-Alloy Nanoparticles
Wang, L.-L., & Johnson, D. D. (2009) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja903247x · Cited by 260
Oezaslan, M., Hasché, F., & Strasser, P. (2012) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/2.075204jes · Cited by 175
Zhang, K., Yue, Q., Chen, G., Zhai, Y., Wang, L., Wang, H., Zhao, J., Liu, J., Jia, J., & Li, H. (2011) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp108305v · Cited by 147
Metadata
- Authors
- Cao, D., Wieckowski, A., Inukai, J., & Alonso-Vante, N.
- Venue
- Journal of The Electrochemical Society
- Publisher
- The Electrochemical Society
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 153
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- A869
- ISSN
- 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2171265394
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oxygen Reduction Reaction on Ruthenium and Rhodium Nanoparticles Modified with Selenium and Sulfur. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1149/1.2180709
- The paper
- Cao, D., Wieckowski, A., Inukai, J., & Alonso-Vante, N. (2006). Oxygen Reduction Reaction on Ruthenium and Rhodium Nanoparticles Modified with Selenium and Sulfur. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2180709
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.