Investigation of Durability Issues of Selected Nonfluorinated Proton Exchange Membranes for Fuel Cell Application
Open accessAbstract
Nonfluorinated sulfonic acid membranes are a group of promising candidate materials for the commercialization of proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) technology. However, one of the main obstacles is that the harsh fuel cell environment may originate different modes of degradation and aging processes that result in either chemical or morphological alteration in these membranes. The effect of peroxide radicals on PEM durability is of particular interest because a common feature of many hydrocarbon-based membranes is that the building block consists of sulfonic acid-substituted aromatic rings, which are much more sensitive to radical attack than the Teflon-like backbone in perfluorinated sulfonic acid type materials. In this work, we attempt to provide answers to the hydroxyl radical initiated durability issues at the PEM and electrocatalyst interface by analyzing the performance of two novel membranes, sulfonated poly(arylene ether sulfone) and sulfonated poly(ether ether) ketone, using a newly designed durability evaluation method under fuel cell-like conditions. This method is able to separate the membrane evaluation process into cathode and anode aspects. Under experimental conditions in this work, degradations in SPES-40 samples were found happening at the cathode (oxygen) side of the PEMFC.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Fenton reagent is commonly used in an accelerated stress test for chemical stability evaluation of PEMs to simulate real-time chemical degradation.
“The Fenton reagent is commonly used in the accelerated stressed test, which can be utilized for chemical stability evaluation of PEMs to simulate the real-time chemical degradation.”
Cites
Sulfonated Poly(ether ether ketone) Membranes for Direct Methanol Fuel Cells
Yang, B., & Manthiram, A. (2003) · Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters · doi:10.1149/1.1613073 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Song, Y., Guo, Z., Yin, J., Liu, M., Tolj, I., Grigoriev, S. A., Ge, M., & Sun, C. (2025) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym17162181 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhang, L., & Mukerjee, S.
- Affiliations
- Northeastern University (US)
- ORCID
- Mukerjee, Sanjeev
- Venue
- Journal of The Electrochemical Society
- Publisher
- The Electrochemical Society
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 153
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- A1062
- ISSN
- 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970719524
- Cited by
- 137
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 11.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of The Electrochemical Society (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Army Research Office
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques
- Keywords
- membrane durability, sulfonated poly(arylene ether sulfone), sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone), hydroxyl radical degradation, peroxy radicals, membrane aging, cathode degradation, proton exchange membrane fuel cells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review