Design of an Electrochemical Cell Making Syngas (CO+H[sub 2]) from CO[sub 2] and H[sub 2]O Reduction at Room Temperature
Abstract
An electrolysis-cell design for simultaneous electrochemical reduction of C O 2 and H 2 O to make syngas ( C O + H 2 ) at room temperature ( 25 ° C ) was developed, based on a technology very close to that of proton-exchange-membrane fuel cells (PEMFC), i.e., based on the use of gas-diffusion electrodes so as to achieve high current densities. While a configuration involving a proton-exchange membrane (Nafion) as electrolyte was shown to be unfavorable for C O 2 reduction, a modified configuration based on the insertion of a pH-buffer layer (aqueous K H C O 3 ) between the silver-based cathode catalyst layer and the Nafion membrane allows for a great enhancement of the cathode selectivity for C O 2 reduction to CO [ca. 30 mA ∕ cm 2 at a potential of − 1.7 to − 1.75 V vs SCE (saturated-calomel reference electrode)]. A C O ∕ H 2 ratio of 1 ∕ 2 , suitable for methanol synthesis, is obtained at a potential of ca. − 2 V vs SCE and a total current density of ca. 80 mA ∕ cm 2 . An issue that has been identified is the change in product selectivity upon long-term electrolysis. Results obtained with two other cell designs are also presented and compared.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Salvatore et al. improved the product selectivity of a BPM system through the addition of a solid-supported aqueous NaHCO3 layer between their BPM and Ag catalyst.
“Salvatore et al. improved the product selectivity of this type of system through the addition of a solid-supported aqueous NaHCO3 layer between their BPM and Ag catalyst.”
From Electrochemical CO <sub>2</sub> Reduction into Chemical Feedstocks: From Mechanistic Electrocatalysis Models to System Design (2019) · cites this paper as [172]
Salvatore et al.'s modified BPM system ran for over 24 hours at 100 mA/cm2 and 65% FECO.
“With this modification, their system ran for over 24 hours at 100 mA/cm 2 and 65% FECO.[172]”
From Electrochemical CO <sub>2</sub> Reduction into Chemical Feedstocks: From Mechanistic Electrocatalysis Models to System Design (2019) · cites this paper as [172]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 442
- Authors
- Delacourt, C., Ridgway, P. L., Kerr, J. B., & Newman, J.
- Affiliations
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
- Venue
- Journal of The Electrochemical Society
- Publisher
- The Electrochemical Society
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 155
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- B42
- ISSN
- 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1602777355
- Cited by
- 442
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 3.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of The Electrochemical Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysts for Methane Reforming
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
- Keywords
- syngas production, electrochemical CO2 reduction, water electrolysis, room-temperature electrolysis, gas diffusion electrode, Nafion membrane, silver catalysts, CO/H2 selectivity, methanol synthesis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review