Cited by 28Fuel Cells and Related MaterialsElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCatalytic Processes in Materials Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Durable Graphitic-Carbon Support for Pt and Pt3Co Cathode Catalysts in Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells

Open access
Selvaganesh, S. Vinod, Sridhar, P., Pitchumani, S., Shukla, A. K.·2013·Journal of The Electrochemical Society

Abstract

The high efficiency of fuel-cell-powered electric vehicles makes them a potentially viable option for future transportation. Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells (PEFCs) are most promising among various fuel cells for electric traction due to their quick start-up and low-temperature operation. In recent years, the performance of PEFCs has reached the acceptable level both for automotive and stationary applications and efforts are now being expended in increasing their durability, which remains a major concern in their commercialization. To make PEFCs meet automotive targets an understanding of the factors affecting the stability of carbon support and platinum catalyst is critical. Alloying platinum (Pt) with first-row transition metals such as cobalt (Co) is reported to facilitate both higher degree of crystallinity and enhanced activity in relation to pristine Pt. But a major challenge for the application of Pt-transition metal alloys in PEFCs is to improve the stability of these binary catalysts. Dissolution of the non-precious metal in the acidic environment could alleviate the activity of the catalysts and hence cell performance. The use of graphitic carbon as cathode-catalyst support enhances the long-term stability of Pt and its alloys in relation to non-graphitic carbon as the former exhibits higher resistance to carbon corrosion in relation to the latter in PEFC cathodes during accelerated-stress test (AST). Changes in electrochemical surface area (ESA), cell performance and charge-transfer resistance are monitored during AST through cyclic voltammetry, cell polarization and impedance measurements, respectively. Studies on catalytic electrodes with X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy and transmission electron microscopy reflect that graphitic carbon-support resists carbon corrosion and helps mitigating aggregation of Pt and Pt 3 Co catalyst particles.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1149/2.051301jes

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. 10.1016/0022-0728(93)80380-Z · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1149/1.2096016 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/nmat1368 · DOI
  4. 10.1149/1.2048590 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/0022-0728(86)90230-5 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/1521-4095(200110)13:19<1507::AID-ADMA1507>3.0.CO;2 · DOI
  7. 10.1021/ja00347a030 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S0167-2738(02)00124-8 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/S1388-2481(02)00485 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0013-4686(02)00644-8 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/j.electacta.2004.04.002 · DOI
  12. 10.1021/jp908203p · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.12.030 · DOI
  14. 10.1149/1.2213387 · DOI
  15. 10.1021/jp807143e · DOI
  16. 10.1021/jp0486649 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.06.021 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.11.066 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.03.006 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1039/c000822b · DOI
  21. 10.1021/jp074929i · DOI
  22. 10.1134/S1023193507010119 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.01.088 · DOI
  24. 10.1149/1.2781040 · DOI
  25. 10.1149/1.2086223 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.05.035 · DOI
  27. 10.1149/1.2059162 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.11.067 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.05.011 · DOI
  30. Thompsett D. , in Handbook of Fuel Cells-Fundamentals, Technology and Applications, Vielstich W. Gasteiger H. Lamn A. (Eds.), vol. 3, Wiley, Chichester, UK, 2003, 467.
  31. Landsman D. A. Luczak F. S. , US Patent, 1982, 4,316,944.
  32. 10.1149/1.1649756 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.10.059 · DOI
  34. 10.1149/1.2220925 · DOI
  35. 10.1149/1.2097361 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.07.004 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1016/j.carbon.2005.01.035 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.09.033 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1149/1.1630412 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.06.041 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.03.056 · DOI
  42. 10.1149/1.2191147 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.electacta.2006.03.021 · DOI
  44. 10.1006/jcat.1995.1171 · DOI
  45. 10.1149/1.2388863 · DOI
  46. He, 2005, Electrochem. Soc. Interface, 14, 41, 10.1149/2.F07053IF · DOI
  47. 10.1149/1.2214544 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/S0926-860X(03)00549-0 · DOI
  49. 10.1021/jp003280d · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.10.057 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.09.039 · DOI
  52. 10.1149/1.3486172 · DOI
  53. 10.1149/1.3421970 · DOI
  54. 10.1021/ja904810h · DOI · Paper page
  55. Yu P. T. Gu W. Zhang J. Makharia R. Wagner F. T. Gasteiger H. A. , in Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell Durability, Büchi F. N. Inaba M. Schmidt T. J. (Eds.), Springer 2009, 29. · DOI
  56. 10.1002/fuce.201000151 · DOI
  57. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.539-543.1303 · DOI
  58. 10.1149/1.2400204 · DOI
  59. 10.1021/jp810970d · DOI
  60. 10.1016/j.electacta.2006.12.080 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/0008-6223(73)90080-8 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.08.053 · DOI
  63. Wagner F. T. Yan S. G. Yu P. T. , in Handbook of Fuel Cells – Fundamentals, Technology and Application, Vielstich W. Yokokawa H. Gasteiger H. A. (Eds.), Advances in Electrocatalysis, Materials, Diagnostics and Durability, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., (2009).
  64. 10.1021/jp046697i · DOI
  65. 10.1021/jp800186p · DOI
  66. Walker, 1955, ASTM BULLETIN, 208, 51
  67. 10.1016/j.carbon.2005.02.018 · DOI
  68. 10.1021/cm00011a018 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 28

Metadata

Authors
Selvaganesh, S. V., Sridhar, P., Pitchumani, S., & Shukla, A. K.
Affiliations
  • Central Electrochemical Research Institute (IN)
  • Indian Institute of Science Bangalore (IN)
Venue
Journal of The Electrochemical Society
Published
2012-11-08
Volume
160
Issue
1
Pages
F49-F59
ISSN
  • 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7111
OpenAlex
W2017256139
Cited by
28
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of The Electrochemical Society (publishedVersion)
  • NOT FOUND REPOSITORY (Indian Institute of Science Bangalore) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Neurosurgery Research and Education Foundation
  • Ministry of New and Renewable Energy India
  • Central ElectroChemical Research Institute
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
Keywords
proton exchange membrane fuel cells, graphitic carbon support, platinum catalysts, cathode catalysts, catalyst stability, carbon corrosion, accelerated stress testing, electrochemically active surface area, charge transfer resistance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review