The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Critical Review of Li/Air Batteries
Open accessAbstract
Lithium/air batteries, based on their high theoretical specific energy, are an extremely attractive technology for electrical energy storage that could make long-range electric vehicles widely affordable.However, the impact of this technology has so far fallen short of its potential due to several daunting challenges.In nonaqueous Li/air cells, reversible chemistry with a high current efficiency over several cycles has not yet been established, and the deposition of an electrically resistive discharge product appears to limit the capacity.Aqueous cells require water-stable lithium-protection membranes that tend to be thick, heavy, and highly resistive.Both types of cell suffer from poor oxygen redox kinetics at the positive electrode and deleterious volume and morphology changes at the negative electrode.Closed Li/air systems that include oxygen storage are much larger and heavier than open systems, but so far oxygen-and OH --selective membranes are not effective in preventing contamination of cells.In this review we discuss the most critical challenges to developing robust, high-energy Li/air batteries and suggest future research directions to understand and overcome these challenges.We predict that Li/air batteries will primarily remain a research topic for the next several years.However, if the fundamental challenges can be met, the Li/air battery has the potential to significantly surpass the energy storage capability of today's Li-ion batteries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics
(2014) · doi:10.1201/b17118 · Cited by 57,706
Adsorption of Gases in Multimolecular Layers
Brunauer, S., Emmett, P. H., & Teller, E. (1938) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja01269a023 · Cited by 28,156
Pearson, R. G. (1963) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00905a001 · Cited by 10,475
Gasteiger, H. A., Kocha, S. S., Sompalli, B., & Wagner, F. T. (2005) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.06.021 · Cited by 4,876
Cited by
Batteries and fuel cells for emerging electric vehicle markets
Cano, Z. P., Banham, D., Ye, S., Hintennach, A., Lu, J., Fowler, M., & Chen, Z. (2018) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-018-0108-1 · Cited by 2,873
Thackeray, M. M., Wolverton, C., & Isaacs, E. D. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee21892e · Cited by 2,515
Placke, T., Kloepsch, R., Dühnen, S., & Winter, M. (2017) · Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10008-017-3610-7 · Cited by 1,117
Artificial Protection Film on Lithium Metal Anode toward Long‐Cycle‐Life Lithium–Oxygen Batteries
Liu, Q., Xu, J., Yuan, S., Chang, Z., Xu, D., Yin, Y., Li, L., Zhong, H., Jiang, Y., Yan, J., et al. (2015) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201501490 · Cited by 482
From lithium to sodium: Cell chemistry of room temperature sodium–air and sodium–sulfur batteries
Adelhelm, P., Hartmann, P., Bender, C. L., Busche, M., Eufinger, C., & Janek, J. (2015) · Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology · doi:10.3762/bjnano.6.105 · Cited by 478
Metadata
- Authors
- Christensen, J., Albertus, P., Sanchez-Carrera, R. S., Lohmann, T., Kozinsky, B., Liedtke, R., Ahmed, J., & Kojic, A.
- Venue
- Journal of The Electrochemical Society
- Publisher
- The Electrochemical Society
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 159
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- R1-R30
- ISSN
- 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7111
- OpenAlex
- W2124845074
- Cited by
- 1,041
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 69.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Critical Review of Li/Air Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1149/2.086202jes
- The paper
- Christensen, J., Albertus, P., Sanchez-Carrera, R. S., Lohmann, T., Kozinsky, B., Liedtke, R., Ahmed, J., & Kojic, A. (2011). A Critical Review of Li/Air Batteries. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.086202jes
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
