The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Method Comparison for Deconvoluting Capacitive and Pseudo-Capacitive Contributions to Electrochemical Capacitor Electrode Behavior
Abstract
Several electrochemical methods have been developed to determine the contribution of different charge storage mechanisms, such as via the electrical double layer and diffusion-limited processes, to electrochemical capacitor behavior. This includes using cyclic voltammetry (CV) data at different sweep rates to obtain the relationship between voltammetric current and sweep rate, and also the relationship between voltammetric charge and sweep rate. Step potential electrochemical spectroscopy (SPECS) also has been used to effectively differentiate between different charge storage mechanisms. Herein we compare these three methods experimentally and also discuss their advantages and limitations toward differentiating between different charge storage mechanisms. These methods have been applied to electrolytic manganese dioxide (EMD) in 0.5 M K2SO4 between 0.0-0.8 V (vs SCE). It was found that in all cases, the specific capacitance was decreased by increasing the sweep rate. The capacitance-sweep rate dependence was only found to be accurate in a short range of low sweep rates. Overall there was good agreement between the SPECS and current-sweep rate dependence models over the full range of sweep rates. However, the SPECS method provided more precise information about the kinetic behavior of the electrochemical cell through a full range of sweep rates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Achieving high energy density and high power density with pseudocapacitive materials
Choi, C., Ashby, D. S., Butts, D. M., DeBlock, R. H., Wei, Q., Lau, J., & Dunn, B. (2019) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-019-0142-z · Cited by 1,964
Towards establishing standard performance metrics for batteries, supercapacitors and beyond
Noori, A., El-Kady, M. F., Rahmanifar, M. S., Kaner, R. B., & Mousavi, M. F. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00581h · Cited by 1,303
Da Silva, L. M., Cesar, R., Moreira, C. M. R., Santos, J. H. M., De Souza, L. G., Pires, B. M., Vicentini, R., Nunes, W., & Zanin, H. (2020) · Energy Storage Materials · doi:10.1016/j.ensm.2019.12.015 · Cited by 357
Direct lithium extraction: A new paradigm for lithium production and resource utilization
Farahbakhsh, J., Arshadi, F., Mofidi, Z., Mohseni-Dargah, M., Kök, C., Assefi, M., Soozanipour, A., Zargar, M., Asadnia, M., Boroumand, Y., et al. (2024) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2023.117249 · Cited by 260
Metadata
- Authors
- Forghani, M., & Donne, S. W.
- Venue
- Journal of The Electrochemical Society
- Publisher
- The Electrochemical Society
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 165
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- A664-A673
- ISSN
- 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7111
- OpenAlex
- W2793197584
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Method Comparison for Deconvoluting Capacitive and Pseudo-Capacitive Contributions to Electrochemical Capacitor Electrode Behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1149/2.0931803jes
- The paper
- Forghani, M., & Donne, S. W. (2018). Method Comparison for Deconvoluting Capacitive and Pseudo-Capacitive Contributions to Electrochemical Capacitor Electrode Behavior. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0931803jes
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.