The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Origin of H2Evolution in LIBs: H2O Reduction vs. Electrolyte Oxidation
Open accessAbstract
Gassing in lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is a serious challenge, especially at high voltage and elevated temperature. In this study, we use On-line Electrochemical Mass Spectrometry (OEMS) and a two-compartment cell with a newly developed aluminum edge-seal to elucidate the origin of H 2 evolution in LIBs. We demonstrate that the new sealing is entirely impermeable for gaseous and liquid species, thus allowing us to measure the true H 2 evolution from H 2 O reduction at a graphite electrode, without interference from the lithium counter-electrode. We further report that graphite//NMC full-cells without any diffusion barrier between anode and cathode show enhanced H 2 generation, especially for high charging potentials and at elevated temperature. We propose that the diffusion of protic electrolyte oxidation species (R-H + ) from the cathode to the anode and their subsequent reduction is the origin of enhanced H 2 gassing. To prove this hypothesis, methanesulfonic acid is added to the electrolyte as a chemical source of protons. At the negative graphite electrode, all H + can be quantitatively reduced to H 2 . By the use of the electrolyte additives vinylene carbonate (VC) and lithium bis(oxalato) borate (LiBOB), less H 2 evolution is observed, since the reduction of both H 2 O and R-H + is hindered by a more effective SEI on graphite. Finally, we demonstrate that the Al-sealed diffusion barrier between anode and cathode can stop the diffusion of oxidation products to the anode and therefore essentially eliminates the generation of H 2 caused by high cathode potentials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Armand, M., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/451652a · Cited by 19,612
Cited by
Sodium Metal Anodes: Emerging Solutions to Dendrite Growth
Lee, B., Paek, E., Mitlin, D., & Lee, S. W. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00642 · Cited by 940
Electrolyte Oxidation Pathways in Lithium-Ion Batteries
Rinkel, B. L. D., Hall, D. S., Temprano, I., & Grey, C. P. (2020) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.0c06363 · Cited by 455
Solvent‐Mediated Li2S Electrodeposition: A Critical Manipulator in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Li, Z., Zhou, Y., Wang, Y., & Lu, Y. (2019) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201802207 · Cited by 429
Schmidt, L., Hankins, K., Bläubaum, L., Gerasimov, M., & Krewer, U. (2025) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/d4sc08105f · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Metzger, M., Strehle, B., Solchenbach, S., & Gasteiger, H. A.
- Venue
- Journal of The Electrochemical Society
- Publisher
- The Electrochemical Society
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 163
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- A798-A809
- ISSN
- 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7111
- OpenAlex
- W2278913458
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Origin of H2Evolution in LIBs: H2O Reduction vs. Electrolyte Oxidation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1149/2.1151605jes
- The paper
- Metzger, M., Strehle, B., Solchenbach, S., & Gasteiger, H. A. (2016). Origin of H2Evolution in LIBs: H2O Reduction vs. Electrolyte Oxidation. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.1151605jes
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.