Cited by 21Innovations in Medical EducationScience Education and PedagogyUndergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research

Assessing core manipulative skills in a large, first-year laboratory

Open access
Moni, Roger W., Hryciw, Deanne H., Poronnik, Philip, Lluka, Lesley J., Moni, Karen B.·2007·Advances in Physiology Education

Abstract

Responding to the concern from our faculty that undergraduate students do not have robust laboratory skills, we designed and implemented a strategy to individually teach and assess the manipulative skills of students in first-year laboratories. Five core laboratory skills were selected for the course entitled Human Biology, a large, first-year class of students, most of whom were enrolled in Bachelor of Pharmacy and Human Movement Studies. Here, we report details for the 365 students enrolled primarily in Pharmacy and Human Movement Studies bachelor degree programs in semester 1 of 2006. We designed a specific strategy to assess five core laboratory skills: 1) accurate and precise use of a micropipette, 2) calculation of dilutions and preparation of diluted samples of saline, 3) accurate representation of data using a graph, 4) use of a light microscope, and 5) acquisition of digital data by measuring the latent period for the Achilles reflex. Graduate tutors were trained to teach and assess each student on each skill. The development of competency was tracked for all students across all five skills. Most students demonstrated proficiency on their first attempt. The development of proficiency across the core skills depended on both the skill and degree program. In semester 2 of 2006, 854 students mostly enrolled in the Bachelor of Science degree program and were similarly taught and assessed on the same five core skills. This approach was an effective teaching and assessment strategy that, when applied beyond first year, should increase the level of laboratory skills across undergraduate programs in physiology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/advan.00020.2007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Moni, R. W., Hryciw, D. H., Poronnik, P., Lluka, L. J., & Moni, K. B.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Educational Research Unit The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Venue
Advances in Physiology Education
Published
2007-09
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
266-269
ISSN
  • 1043-4046 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1229
OpenAlex
W2138518059
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • AJP Advances in Physiology Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Undergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research
Keywords
laboratory skills assessment, manipulative skills, undergraduate physiology education, graphing skills, optical microscopy, Achilles tendon reflex, competence development, large class teaching, pharmacy students
MeSH terms
Humans, Laboratories, Movement, Pharmacology, Professional Competence, Queensland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review