The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of problem-based learning in a large classroom setting: student perception and problem-solving skills
Abstract
Problem-based learning (PBL) can be described as a learning environment where the problem drives the learning. This technique usually involves learning in small groups, which are supervised by tutors. It is becoming evident that PBL in a small-group setting has a robust positive effect on student learning and skills, including better problem-solving skills and an increase in overall motivation. However, very little research has been done on the educational benefits of PBL in a large classroom setting. Here, we describe a PBL approach (using tutorless groups) that was introduced as a supplement to standard didactic lectures in University of British Columbia Okanagan undergraduate biochemistry classes consisting of 45–85 students. PBL was chosen as an effective method to assist students in learning biochemical and physiological processes. By monitoring student attendance and using informal and formal surveys, we demonstrated that PBL has a significant positive impact on student motivation to attend and participate in the course work. Student responses indicated that PBL is superior to traditional lecture format with regard to the understanding of course content and retention of information. We also demonstrated that student problem-solving skills are significantly improved, but additional controlled studies are needed to determine how much PBL exercises contribute to this improvement. These preliminary data indicated several positive outcomes of using PBL in a large classroom setting, although further studies aimed at assessing student learning are needed to further justify implementation of this technique in courses delivered to large undergraduate classes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Koh, G. C.-H., Khoo, H. E., Wong, M. L., & Koh, D. (2008) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.070565 · Cited by 659
Problem-based learning: have the expectations been met?
Berkson, L. (1993) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-199310000-00053 · Cited by 430
Antepohl, W., & Herzig, S. (1999) · Medical Education · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00289.x · Cited by 235
Cited by
Dost, S., Hossain, A., Shehab, M., Abdelwahed, A., & Al-Nusair, L. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042378 · Cited by 912
Tune, J. D., Sturek, M., & Basile, D. P. (2013) · Advances in Physiology Education · doi:10.1152/advan.00091.2013 · Cited by 593
Fukuzawa, S., & Boyd, C. (2016) · The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning · doi:10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2016.1.7 · Cited by 21
Leas, H. D., Nelson, K. L., Grandgenett, N., Tapprich, W. E., & Cutucache, C. E. (2017) · Journal of Youth Development · doi:10.5195/jyd.2017.474 · Cited by 18
Sergis, S., Vlachopoulos, P., Sampson, D. G., & Pelliccione, L. (2017) · Handbook on Digital Learning for K-12 Schools · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-33808-8_12 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Klegeris, A., & Hurren, H.
- Venue
- Advances in Physiology Education
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 408-415
- ISSN
- 1043-4046 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1229
- OpenAlex
- W2170698282
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 35.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of problem-based learning in a large classroom setting: student perception and problem-solving skills. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/advan.00046.2011
- The paper
- Klegeris, A., & Hurren, H. (2011). Impact of problem-based learning in a large classroom setting: student perception and problem-solving skills. Advances in Physiology Education. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00046.2011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.