Cited by 3Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social SciencesProblem and Project Based LearningInnovations in Medical Education

Bang the gavel: animal experimentation on trial—an interdisciplinary mock trial at the school of health sciences

Open access
Ghimouz, Rym, O’Sullivan, Siobhan, Baltatu, Ovidiu Constantin, Campos, Luciana Aparecida·2021·Advances in Physiology Education

Abstract

Active learning activities offer opportunities for medical students to facilitate the retention of knowledge and develop soft skills. We aimed to create a guide for an interdisciplinary mock trial learning activity within the medical curriculum of the College of Medicine, Anhembi Morumbi University-Laureate International Universities, Sao Paulo, Brazil. We designed an "Animal Experimentation Mock Trial" in which students are coached to search for scientific, legal, and ethical arguments pro and contra animal experimentation in medical research. The mock trial is prepared and staged with student teams to play the 1 ) presiding judge, 2 ) the plaintiff's attorney and expert witnesses contra animal research, 3 ) the defense attorney and expert witnesses pro animal research, and 4 ) the jury. The plaintiff and defense teams made presentations, and between each presentation the jury put questions to presenters (cross-examination). The jury team gave two evaluation scores after the plaintiff's presentation and then after the defense presentation. The formal feedback for this active learning activity indicated that students expressed satisfaction with the teaching strategies employed in the course. The mock trial with the lesson plan provides a learning mean to exemplify the complex relationship between animal experimentation, medical evidence, ethics, and law/regulations. This mock trial helps medical students to develop their soft skills, such as the ability to collaborate and als…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/advan.00171.2020

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ghimouz, R., O’Sullivan, S., Baltatu, O. C., & Campos, L. A.
Affiliations
  • Abu Dhabi University (AE)
  • College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
  • Khalifa University of Science and Technology (AE)
Corresponding author
Campos, Luciana Aparecida
Venue
Advances in Physiology Education
Published
2021-03-01
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
44-47
ISSN
  • 1043-4046 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1229
OpenAlex
W3122818584
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AJP Advances in Physiology Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
animal experimentation, mock trial, active learning, medical students, animal research ethics, animal research regulation, legal arguments, interdisciplinary teaching, soft skills, medical curriculum
MeSH terms
Animals, Brazil, Curriculum, Humans, Students, Medical, Universities, Animal Experimentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review