Cited by 51Muscle metabolism and nutritionPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancerMuscle Physiology and Disorders

Differential localization and anabolic responsiveness of mTOR complexes in human skeletal muscle in response to feeding and exercise

Open access
Hodson, Nathan, McGlory, Chris, Oikawa, Sara Y., Jeromson, Stewart, Song, Zhe, Rüegg, Markus A., Hamilton, D. Lee, Phillips, Stuart M. +1 more·2017·American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology

Abstract

Mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) resides as two complexes within skeletal muscle. mTOR complex 1 [mTORC1–regulatory associated protein of mTOR (Raptor) positive] regulates skeletal muscle growth, whereas mTORC2 [rapamycin-insensitive companion of mTOR (Rictor) positive] regulates insulin sensitivity. To examine the regulation of these complexes in human skeletal muscle, we utilized immunohistochemical analysis to study the localization of mTOR complexes before and following protein-carbohydrate feeding (FED) and resistance exercise plus protein-carbohydrate feeding (EXFED) in a unilateral exercise model. In basal samples, mTOR and the lysosomal marker lysosomal associated membrane protein 2 (LAMP2) were highly colocalized and remained so throughout. In the FED and EXFED states, mTOR/LAMP2 complexes were redistributed to the cell periphery [wheat germ agglutinin (WGA)-positive staining] (time effect; P = 0.025), with 39% (FED) and 26% (EXFED) increases in mTOR/WGA association observed 1 h post-feeding/exercise. mTOR/WGA colocalization continued to increase in EXFED at 3 h (48% above baseline) whereas colocalization decreased in FED (21% above baseline). A significant effect of condition ( P = 0.05) was noted suggesting mTOR/WGA colocalization was greater during EXFED. This pattern was replicated in Raptor/WGA association, where a significant difference between EXFED and FED was noted at 3 h post-exercise/feeding ( P = 0.014). Rictor/WGA colocalization remained unaltered throughout the trial. Alterations in mTORC1 cellular location coincided with elevated S6K1 kinase activity, which rose to a greater extent in EXFED compared with FED at 1 h post-exercise/feeding ( P < 0.001), and only remained elevated in EXFED at the 3 h time point ( P = 0.037). Collectively these data suggest that mTORC1 redistribution within the cell is a fundamental response to resistance exercise and feeding, whereas mTORC2 is predominantly situated at the sarcolemma and does not alter localization.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpcell.00176.2017

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Skeletal muscle mTORC2 activity seems unresponsive to a bout of resistance training in humans based upon localization of the complex not being altered following a bout of resistance training.

    “In contrast, skeletal muscle mTORC2 activity seems unresponsive to a bout of resistance training in humans based upon the localization of the complex not being altered following a bout of resistance training (Hodson et al., 2017).”

    From Skeletal Muscle Ribosome and Mitochondrial Biogenesis in Response to Different Exercise Training Modalities (2021) · cites this paper as Hodson et al., 2017

    The Discussion reports that mTORC2 colocalization with the cell membrane was unaffected by resistance exercise or protein-carbohydrate ingestion. That supports the localization part of the claim, but unchanged localization does not establish unchanged mTORC2 activity; the paper reports Akt and S6K1 kinase assays, not a direct mTORC2 activity measurement. Its exercise condition also combined resistance exercise with feeding. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 51

Authors
Hodson, N., McGlory, C., Oikawa, S. Y., Jeromson, S., Song, Z., Rüegg, M. A., Hamilton, D. L., Phillips, S. M., & Philp, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • University of Stirling (GB)
  • University of Basel (CH)
Corresponding author
Philp, Andrew
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
Published
2017-12-01
Volume
313
Issue
6
Pages
C604-C611
ISSN
  • 0363-6143 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1563
OpenAlex
W2758796129
Cited by
51
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (acceptedVersion)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/L023547/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
Keywords
mTOR complex, mTORC1, mTORC2, skeletal muscle, resistance training, subcellular localization, raptors, Rictor, sarcolemma, anabolic signaling, insulin sensitivity
MeSH terms
Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1, Regulatory-Associated Protein of mTOR, Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 2, Rapamycin-Insensitive Companion of mTOR Protein, Adult, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Proteins, Eating, Energy Metabolism, Humans, Lysosomes, Male, Muscle Contraction, Sarcolemma, Time Factors, Exercise, Protein Transport, Ribosomal Protein S6 Kinases, 70-kDa, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt, Quadriceps Muscle, Lysosomal-Associated Membrane Protein 2, Resistance Training, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review