Effects of sodium on beta-cell electrical activity
Abstract
The present studies, designed to evaluate the contribution of Na+ to the mouse pancreatic beta-cell membrane potential, were performed utilizing intracellular microelectrodes. Complete removal of external sodium, in the presence of glucose, did not significantly affect spike peak potential. However, it caused a negative shift of the resting membrane potential, both in the presence and absence of glucose. After this initial hyperpolarization, the membrane gradually depolarized, the rate of depolarization being slower in the absence of glucose. This two-phase hyperpolarization-depolarization pattern remained when ouabain was added, both in the presence and absence of glucose. An increase of input resistance was associated with the slow depolarization. During this depolarization the maximum rate of rise (dV/dtmax) of the action potential ("spike") decreased. There was no direct relationship between dV/dtmax and [Na]0. Readdition of low [Na]0 (14 mM) to a glucose medium reactivated the postburst hyperpolarization (PBH), even in the presence of ouabain. These observations indicate that there is a significant resting sodium permeability (PNa). However, the action potential (spike) is not generated by activation of a voltage-dependent (gated) sodium channel. The membrane depolarization after Na+ removal reflects concomitant inhibition of the Na+-K+ pump and decrease of potassium permeability (PK). The blockage of PBH in the absence of Na+ is not related to the inhibition of an oscil…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Removal of extracellular Na+ does not prevent glucose-induced depolarization, which argues that the background inward current cannot be Na+-dependent.
“The fact that removal of extracellular Na+ does not prevent glucose-induced depolarization (549, 618) argues that the current cannot be Na+-dependent.”
From Pancreatic β-Cell Electrical Activity and Insulin Secretion: Of Mice and Men (2018) · cites this paper as [549]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pancreatic β-Cell Electrical Activity and Insulin Secretion: Of Mice and Men
Rorsman, P., & Ashcroft, F. M. (2018) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00008.2017 · Cited by 793 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ribalet, B., & Beigelman, P. M.
- ORCID
- Ribalet, B.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1982-05-01
- Volume
- 242
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- C296-C303
- ISSN
- 0363-6143 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1563
- OpenAlex
- W2268223071
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion Transport and Channel Regulation
- Keywords
- sodium, pancreatic beta cells, membrane potential, resting membrane potential, action potential, sodium permeability, Na+/K+-ATPase, potassium permeability, ouabain, input resistance, glucose, beta-cell electrical activity
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Animals, Glucose, Islets of Langerhans, Membrane Potentials, Ouabain, Sodium, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review