The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of the electroinjection method for introducing proteins into living cells
Abstract
The introduction of impermeant probes such as antibodies and other proteins into living cells without compromising physiological function is an important approach for studying cellular regulatory mechanisms. Many techniques including direct microinjection, liposome-mediated delivery, fusion of red cell ghosts, and osmotic lysis of pinocytic vesicles have been used to introduce proteins into intact cells. We have used a modification of the voltage-discharge technique to introduce antibodies and other proteins into living physiologically responsive pheochromocytoma and other cultured cells. In this technique, called electroinjection, a single discharge of relatively low field strength is used to transiently permeabilize the plasma membrane. Our experiments demonstrate that electroinjection permits the introduction of large amounts (microM) of probe into 2-5 x 10(6) cells simultaneously without compromising cell viability or physiological responsiveness when performed under carefully defined conditions. They also demonstrate that electroinjection results in a single population of loaded cells and that protein incorporation is a function of field strength, capacitance, molecular weight of the protein, and the concentration of the protein in the electroinjection buffer. Interestingly, a significant fraction of the protein electroinjected into cells is trapped in the plasma membrane when cells are shocked at high capacitance. These results demonstrate that electroinjection appears to be an efficient method for loading exogenous proteins into cells while maintaining the integrity of the physiological properties of the cell.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Jaeschke, H., McGill, M. R., & Ramachandran, A. (2012) · Drug Metabolism Reviews · doi:10.3109/03602532.2011.602688 · Cited by 964
Wilson, P. D. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra022161 · Cited by 916
Intracellular Delivery by Membrane Disruption: Mechanisms, Strategies, and Concepts
Stewart, M. P., Langer, R., & Jensen, K. F. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00678 · Cited by 747
Drummond, I. A., Majumdar, A., Hentschel, H., Elger, M., Solnica-Krezel, L., Schier, A. F., Neuhauss, S. C. F., Stemple, D. L., Zwartkruis, F., Rangini, Z., et al. (1998) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.125.23.4655 · Cited by 486
Hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury: Pathogenic mechanisms and basis for hepatoprotection
TEOH, N. C., & FARRELL, G. C. (2003) · Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1046/j.1440-1746.2003.03056.x · Cited by 441
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, A. K., Horwitz, J., & De Lanerolle, P.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1991-02-01
- Volume
- 260
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- C355-C363
- ISSN
- 0363-6143 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1563
- OpenAlex
- W2255266097
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of the electroinjection method for introducing proteins into living cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/ajpcell.1991.260.2.c355
- The paper
- Wilson, A. K., Horwitz, J., & De Lanerolle, P. (1991). Evaluation of the electroinjection method for introducing proteins into living cells. American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.1991.260.2.c355
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.