Effects of vasopressin and cAMP on single amiloride-blockable Na channels
Abstract
To determine the mechanism by which vasopressin increases sodium transport in sodium-transporting, tight epithelia, we examined single amiloride-blockable Na channels in membrane patches from cultured distal nephron cells (A6) either before or after treatment with arginine vasopressin. Pretreatment of cells with vasopressin (40 mU/ml) for 40-50 min increases NPo (N, the number of Na channels; Po, the open probability of an individual Na channel). The increase in NPo is due to an increase in the number of conductive Na channels with little or no change in the open probability of individual Na channels. Pretreatment of cells for 1 h with 1 mM N6,2'-O-dibutyryladenosine 3', 5'-cyclic monophosphate (DBcAMP) also increased NPo. The increase in NPo caused by DBcAMP pretreatment is also due to the increase in the number of conductive Na channels with no change in the open probability of individual Na channels. Cells pretreated with cholera toxin (CTX; 250 ng/ml) for 4 h appeared similar to cells that had been treated with vasopressin or DBcAMP; that is, the number of Na channels per patch increased with little or no effect on the open probability of individual Na channels. For patches from many untreated cells, when the frequency of occurrence is plotted against the number of channels in an individual patch, the histogram consists of a single peak with a number of channels per patch of 2.0 +/- 1.5 (+/- SD, 126 patches). After pretreatment of cells with vasopressin, DBcAMP, or CTX, the same histogram contains two peaks after vasopressin of 1.8 +/- 1.2 and 9.2 +/- 1.5 (+/- SD, 38 and 53 patches, respectively). These observations suggest that pretreatment of cells with vasopressin, DBcAMP, or CTX may act by promoting insertion of clusters of new sodium channels.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Suprabulbar noradrenergic projections to the forebrain activate the sympathetic nervous system.
“Suprabulbar noradrenergic projections to the forebrain activate the sympathetic nervous system.20”
From Phenotypic Evidence of Faulty Neuronal Norepinephrine Reuptake in Essential Hypertension (2000) · cites this paper as [20]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 9 · Cited by 207
- Authors
- Marunaka, Y., & Eaton, D. C.
- Affiliations
- Emory University (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1991-05-01
- Volume
- 260
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- C1071-C1084
- ISSN
- 0363-6143 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1563
- OpenAlex
- W2418942336
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 3.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK37963)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion Transport and Channel Regulation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
- Keywords
- vasopressin, cyclic AMP, amiloride-sensitive sodium channel, cholera toxin, dibutyryl cyclic AMP, A6 cells, distal nephron, sodium transport, tight epithelia
- MeSH terms
- Cyclic AMP, Amiloride, Animals, Arginine Vasopressin, Cell Division, Cell Line, Cholera Toxin, Bucladesine, Mathematics, Membrane Potentials, Models, Biological, Nephrons, Sodium Channels, Ion Channel Gating, Culture Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review