Cited by 207Ion Transport and Channel RegulationIon channel regulation and functionIon Channels and Receptors

Effects of vasopressin and cAMP on single amiloride-blockable Na channels

Marunaka, Y., Eaton, D. C.·1991·American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology

Abstract

To determine the mechanism by which vasopressin increases sodium transport in sodium-transporting, tight epithelia, we examined single amiloride-blockable Na channels in membrane patches from cultured distal nephron cells (A6) either before or after treatment with arginine vasopressin. Pretreatment of cells with vasopressin (40 mU/ml) for 40-50 min increases NPo (N, the number of Na channels; Po, the open probability of an individual Na channel). The increase in NPo is due to an increase in the number of conductive Na channels with little or no change in the open probability of individual Na channels. Pretreatment of cells for 1 h with 1 mM N6,2'-O-dibutyryladenosine 3', 5'-cyclic monophosphate (DBcAMP) also increased NPo. The increase in NPo caused by DBcAMP pretreatment is also due to the increase in the number of conductive Na channels with no change in the open probability of individual Na channels. Cells pretreated with cholera toxin (CTX; 250 ng/ml) for 4 h appeared similar to cells that had been treated with vasopressin or DBcAMP; that is, the number of Na channels per patch increased with little or no effect on the open probability of individual Na channels. For patches from many untreated cells, when the frequency of occurrence is plotted against the number of channels in an individual patch, the histogram consists of a single peak with a number of channels per patch of 2.0 +/- 1.5 (+/- SD, 126 patches). After pretreatment of cells with vasopressin, DBcAMP, or CTX, the same histogram contains two peaks after vasopressin of 1.8 +/- 1.2 and 9.2 +/- 1.5 (+/- SD, 38 and 53 patches, respectively). These observations suggest that pretreatment of cells with vasopressin, DBcAMP, or CTX may act by promoting insertion of clusters of new sodium channels.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpcell.1991.260.5.c1071

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 9 · Cited by 207

Authors
Marunaka, Y., & Eaton, D. C.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
Published
1991-05-01
Volume
260
Issue
5
Pages
C1071-C1084
ISSN
  • 0363-6143 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1563
OpenAlex
W2418942336
Cited by
207
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK37963)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion Transport and Channel Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
Keywords
vasopressin, cyclic AMP, amiloride-sensitive sodium channel, cholera toxin, dibutyryl cyclic AMP, A6 cells, distal nephron, sodium transport, tight epithelia
MeSH terms
Cyclic AMP, Amiloride, Animals, Arginine Vasopressin, Cell Division, Cell Line, Cholera Toxin, Bucladesine, Mathematics, Membrane Potentials, Models, Biological, Nephrons, Sodium Channels, Ion Channel Gating, Culture Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review