Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 228

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Differences in gap junction channels between cardiac myocytes, fibroblasts, and heterologous pairs

Rook, M. B., van Ginneken, A. C., de Jonge, B., el Aoumari, A., Gros, D., Jongsma, H. J.·1992·American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology

Abstract

Cultures of neonatal rat heart cells contain predominantly myocytes and fibroblastic cells. Most abundant are groups of synchronously contracting myocytes, which are electrically well coupled through large gap junctions. Cardiac fibroblasts may be electrically coupled to each other and to adjacent myocytes, be it with low intercellular conductances. Nevertheless, synchronously beating myocytes interconnected via a fibroblast were present, demonstrating that nonexcitable cardiac cells are capable of passive impulse conduction. In fibroblast pairs as well as in myocyte-fibroblast cell pairs, no sensitivity to junctional voltage could be detected when transjunctional conductance was > 1-2 nS. However, in pairs coupled by a conductance of < 1 nS, complex voltage-dependent gating was evident; gap junction channel open probability decreased with increasing junctional voltage but a nongated residual conductance remained at all voltages tested. Single gap junction channel conductance between fibroblasts was approximately 21 pS, very similar to an approximately 18-pS channel conductance that was found between myocytes next to the major conductance of 43 pS. Single-channel conductance in heterologous myocyte-fibroblast gap junctions was approximately 32 pS, which matches the theoretical value of 29 pS for gap junction channels composed of a fibroblast connexon and the major myocyte connexon. A site-directed antibody against rat heart gap junction protein connexin43 recognized gap junctions between neonatal cardiomyocytes, as demonstrated by immunocytochemical labeling. In contrast, junctions between fibroblasts showed no labeling, while in myocyte-fibroblast junctions labeling occasionally was present. Our results suggest the existence of two gap junction proteins between neonatal rat cardiocytes, connexin43 and another yet unidentified connexin. An alternative explanation (cell-specific regulation of the conductance of connexin43 channels) is discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpcell.1992.263.5.c959

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 228

Metadata

Authors
Rook, M. B., van Ginneken, A. C., de Jonge, B., el Aoumari, A., Gros, D., & Jongsma, H. J.
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
Published
1992-11-01
Volume
263
Issue
5
Pages
C959-C977
ISSN
  • 0363-6143 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1563
OpenAlex
W1842856476
Cited by
228
References
0
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differences in gap junction channels between cardiac myocytes, fibroblasts, and heterologous pairs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/ajpcell.1992.263.5.c959
The paper
Rook, M. B., van Ginneken, A. C., de Jonge, B., el Aoumari, A., Gros, D., & Jongsma, H. J. (1992). Differences in gap junction channels between cardiac myocytes, fibroblasts, and heterologous pairs. American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.1992.263.5.c959

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.