Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 214

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Characteristics of rabbit ClC-2 current expressed in Xenopus oocytes and its contribution to volume regulation

Furukawa, Tetsushi, Ogura, Takehiko, Katayama, Yoshifumi, Hiraoka, Masayasu·1998·American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology

Abstract

In the Xenopus oocyte heterologous expression system, the electrophysiological characteristics of rabbit ClC-2 current and its contribution to volume regulation were examined. Expressed currents on oocytes were recorded with a two-electrode voltage-clamp technique. Oocyte volume was assessed by taking pictures of oocytes with a magnification of ×40. Rabbit ClC-2 currents exhibited inward rectification and had a halide anion permeability sequence of Cl− ≥ Br− ≫ I− ≥ F−. ClC-2 currents were inhibited by 5-nitro-2-(3-phenylpropylamino)benzoic acid (NPPB), diphenylamine-2-carboxylic acid (DPC), and anthracene-9-carboxylic acid (9-AC), with a potency order of NPPB > DPC = 9-AC, but were resistant to stilbene disulfonates. These characteristics are similar to those of rat ClC-2, suggesting rabbit ClC-2 as a counterpart of rat ClC-2. During a 30-min perfusion with hyposmolar solution, current amplitude at −160 mV and oocyte diameter were compared among three groups: oocytes injected with distilled water, oocytes injected with ClC-2 cRNA, and oocytes injected with ClC-2ΔNT cRNA (an open channel mutant with NH 2-terminal truncation). Maximum inward current was largest in ClC-2ΔNT-injected oocytes (−5.9 ± 0.4 μA), followed by ClC-2-injected oocytes (−4.3 ± 0.6 μA), and smallest in water-injected oocytes (−0.2 ± 0.2 μA), whereas the order of increase in oocyte diameter was as follows: water-injected oocytes (9.0 ± 0.2%) > ClC-2-injected oocytes (5.3 ± 0.5%) > ClC-2ΔNT-injected oocytes (1.1 ± 0.2%). The findings that oocyte swelling was smallest in oocytes with the largest expressed currents suggest that ClC-2 currents expressed in Xenopusoocytes appear to act for volume regulation when exposed to a hyposmolar environment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpcell.1998.274.2.c500

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 214

Metadata

Authors
Furukawa, T., Ogura, T., Katayama, Y., & Hiraoka, M.
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
Published
1998-02-01
Volume
274
Issue
2
Pages
C500-C512
ISSN
  • 0363-6143 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1563
OpenAlex
W2127690268
Cited by
214
References
0
FWCI
4.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characteristics of rabbit ClC-2 current expressed in Xenopus oocytes and its contribution to volume regulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/ajpcell.1998.274.2.c500
The paper
Furukawa, T., Ogura, T., Katayama, Y., & Hiraoka, M. (1998). Characteristics of rabbit ClC-2 current expressed in Xenopus oocytes and its contribution to volume regulation. American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.1998.274.2.c500

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.