Cited by 121Estrogen and related hormone effectsMuscle Physiology and DisordersCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Difference in skeletal muscle function in males vs. females: role of estrogen receptor-β

Glenmark, Birgitta, Nilsson, Maria, Gao, Hui, Gustafsson, Jan-Åke, Dahlman-Wright, Karin, Westerblad, Håkan·2004·American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism

Abstract

Male skeletal muscles are generally faster and have higher maximum power output than female muscles. Conversely, during repeated contractions, female muscles are generally more fatigue resistant and recover faster. We studied the role of estrogen receptor-β (ERβ) in this gender difference by comparing contractile function of soleus (mainly slow-twitch) and extensor digitorum longus (fast-twitch) muscles isolated from ERβ-deficient (ERβ−/−) and wild-type mice of both sexes. Results showed generally shorter contraction and relaxation times in male compared with female muscles, and ERβ deficiency had no effect on this. Fatigue (induced by repeated tetanic contractions) and recovery of female muscles were not affected by ERβ deficiency. However, male ERβ−/− muscles were slightly more fatigue resistant and produced higher forces during the recovery period than wild-type male muscles. In fact, female muscles and male ERβ−/− muscles displayed markedly better recovery than male wild-type muscles. Gene screening of male soleus muscles showed 25 genes that were differently expressed in ERβ−/− and wild-type mice. Five of these genes were selected for further analysis: muscle ankyrin repeat protein-2, muscle LIM protein, calsequestrin, parvalbumin, and aquaporin-1. Expression of these genes showed a similar general pattern: increased expression in male and decreased expression in female ERβ−/− muscles. In conclusion, ERβ deficiency results in increased performance during fatigue and recovery of male muscles, whereas female muscles are not affected. Improved contractile performance of male ERβ−/− mouse muscles was associated with increased expression of mRNAs encoding important muscle proteins.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpendo.00098.2004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The divergent effects across testis, levator ani, and striated muscle tissue likely reside in tissue-specific receptor distribution of ERβ.

    “The key to explaining the divergent effects across the testis, levator ani, and striated muscle tissue likely resides in the tissue-specific receptor distribution of ERβ [41,42].”
  • Contraction duration is significantly longer in the female soleus in both wild-type (91 ms) and null (100 ms) compared with male wild-type (57 ms) and null (63 ms) mice.

    “Contraction duration is significantly longer in the female soleus in both wild-type (91 ms) and null (100 ms) compared with male wild-type (57 ms) and null (63 ms) mice.”
  • Relaxation time during a basic contraction in the soleus is significantly shorter in wild-type males (104 ms) than in females (158 ms) and in null males (104 ms) compared with null females (191 ms).

    “Relaxation time during a basic contraction in the soleus is significantly shorter in wild-type males (104 ms) than in females (158 ms) and in null males (104 ms) compared with null females (191 ms).”
  • Following a fatiguing protocol on soleus and EDL muscle, force decreases less in ERβ−/− males than in wild-type males, whereas the reverse is true for females, suggesting a role for ERβ knockout in enhancing endurance in males and reducing endurance in females.

    “Following a fatiguing protocol on soleus and EDL muscle, force decreases less in ERβ−/− males than in wild-type males, whereas the reverse is true for females, suggesting a role for ERβ knockout in enhancing endurance in males and reducing endurance in females (33).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 121

Authors
Glenmark, B., Nilsson, M., Gao, H., Gustafsson, J.-Å., Dahlman-Wright, K., & Westerblad, H.
Affiliations
  • Stockholm South General Hospital (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
Published
2004-12
Volume
287
Issue
6
Pages
E1125-E1131
ISSN
  • 0193-1849 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1555
OpenAlex
W2094053629
Cited by
121
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
estrogen receptor beta, sex differences, skeletal muscle contractile function, muscle fatigue, fatigue recovery, soleus muscle, extensor digitorum longus, gene expression, muscle LIM protein, calsequestrin, parvalbumin, aquaporin-1
MeSH terms
Animals, Female, Male, Muscle Contraction, RNA, Messenger, Sex Characteristics, Gene Expression, Mice, Knockout, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Fatigue, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Estrogen Receptor beta, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review