Difference in skeletal muscle function in males vs. females: role of estrogen receptor-β
Abstract
Male skeletal muscles are generally faster and have higher maximum power output than female muscles. Conversely, during repeated contractions, female muscles are generally more fatigue resistant and recover faster. We studied the role of estrogen receptor-β (ERβ) in this gender difference by comparing contractile function of soleus (mainly slow-twitch) and extensor digitorum longus (fast-twitch) muscles isolated from ERβ-deficient (ERβ−/−) and wild-type mice of both sexes. Results showed generally shorter contraction and relaxation times in male compared with female muscles, and ERβ deficiency had no effect on this. Fatigue (induced by repeated tetanic contractions) and recovery of female muscles were not affected by ERβ deficiency. However, male ERβ−/− muscles were slightly more fatigue resistant and produced higher forces during the recovery period than wild-type male muscles. In fact, female muscles and male ERβ−/− muscles displayed markedly better recovery than male wild-type muscles. Gene screening of male soleus muscles showed 25 genes that were differently expressed in ERβ−/− and wild-type mice. Five of these genes were selected for further analysis: muscle ankyrin repeat protein-2, muscle LIM protein, calsequestrin, parvalbumin, and aquaporin-1. Expression of these genes showed a similar general pattern: increased expression in male and decreased expression in female ERβ−/− muscles. In conclusion, ERβ deficiency results in increased performance during fatigue and recovery of male muscles, whereas female muscles are not affected. Improved contractile performance of male ERβ−/− mouse muscles was associated with increased expression of mRNAs encoding important muscle proteins.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The divergent effects across testis, levator ani, and striated muscle tissue likely reside in tissue-specific receptor distribution of ERβ.
“The key to explaining the divergent effects across the testis, levator ani, and striated muscle tissue likely resides in the tissue-specific receptor distribution of ERβ [41,42].”
Contraction duration is significantly longer in the female soleus in both wild-type (91 ms) and null (100 ms) compared with male wild-type (57 ms) and null (63 ms) mice.
“Contraction duration is significantly longer in the female soleus in both wild-type (91 ms) and null (100 ms) compared with male wild-type (57 ms) and null (63 ms) mice.”
From Sex-Based Differences in Skeletal Muscle Kinetics and Fiber-Type Composition (2015) · cites this paper as [33]
Relaxation time during a basic contraction in the soleus is significantly shorter in wild-type males (104 ms) than in females (158 ms) and in null males (104 ms) compared with null females (191 ms).
“Relaxation time during a basic contraction in the soleus is significantly shorter in wild-type males (104 ms) than in females (158 ms) and in null males (104 ms) compared with null females (191 ms).”
From Sex-Based Differences in Skeletal Muscle Kinetics and Fiber-Type Composition (2015) · cites this paper as [33]
Following a fatiguing protocol on soleus and EDL muscle, force decreases less in ERβ−/− males than in wild-type males, whereas the reverse is true for females, suggesting a role for ERβ knockout in enhancing endurance in males and reducing endurance in females.
“Following a fatiguing protocol on soleus and EDL muscle, force decreases less in ERβ−/− males than in wild-type males, whereas the reverse is true for females, suggesting a role for ERβ knockout in enhancing endurance in males and reducing endurance in females (33).”
From Sex-Based Differences in Skeletal Muscle Kinetics and Fiber-Type Composition (2015) · cites this paper as [33]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 121
- Authors
- Glenmark, B., Nilsson, M., Gao, H., Gustafsson, J.-Å., Dahlman-Wright, K., & Westerblad, H.
- Affiliations
- Stockholm South General Hospital (SE)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 287
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- E1125-E1131
- ISSN
- 0193-1849 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1555
- OpenAlex
- W2094053629
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Keywords
- estrogen receptor beta, sex differences, skeletal muscle contractile function, muscle fatigue, fatigue recovery, soleus muscle, extensor digitorum longus, gene expression, muscle LIM protein, calsequestrin, parvalbumin, aquaporin-1
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Female, Male, Muscle Contraction, RNA, Messenger, Sex Characteristics, Gene Expression, Mice, Knockout, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Fatigue, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Estrogen Receptor beta, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review