Cited by 20Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsPancreatic function and diabetesGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Familiality of metabolic abnormalities is dependent on age at onset and phenotype of the type 2 diabetic proband

Tripathy, D., Lindholm, E., Isomaa, B., Saloranta, C., Tuomi, T., Groop, L.·2003·American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism

Abstract

To determine the impact of a family history of the common form of type 2 diabetes and the phenotype of the proband on anthropometric and metabolic variables in normoglycemic first-degree relatives, we studied 2,100 first-degree relatives of patients with the common form of type 2 diabetes (FH+) and 388 subjects without a family history of diabetes (FH-). All subjects participated in an oral glucose tolerance test to allow measurement of insulin secretion [30-min incremental insulin/glucose (I/G 30)] and insulin sensitivity [homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) of insulin resistance (IR)]. A subset participated in a euglycemic clamp (n = 75) and an intravenous glucose tolerance test (n = 300). To study the effect of a particular phenotype of the proband, insulin secretion and sensitivity were also compared between first-degree relatives of diabetic probands with high and low waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and probands with early and late onset of diabetes. FH+ subjects were more insulin resistant, as seen from a higher HOMA-IR index (P = 0.006) and a lower rate of insulin-stimulated glucose uptake (P = 0.001) and had more features of the metabolic syndrome (P = 0.02, P = 0.0002) compared with FH- subjects. Insulin secretion adjusted for insulin resistance (disposition index, DI) was also lower in the FH+ vs. FH- subjects (P = 0.04). Relatives of diabetic probands with a high WHR had reduced insulin-mediated glucose uptake compared with relatives of probands with a low WHR (P = 0.04).…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpendo.00113.2003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lean NGT offspring of two parents with type 2 diabetes exhibit moderate to severe skeletal muscle insulin resistance.

    “Multiple investigators unequivocally have demonstrated that lean NGT offspring of two parents with type 2 diabetes exhibit moderate to severe skeletal muscle insulin resistance ( 28 – 33 ).”

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 40 · Cited by 20

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. 10.1016/S0026-0495(98)90234-7 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/BF00403284 · DOI
  3. 10.2337/diab.37.6.667 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1056/NEJM199303113281005 · DOI
  5. 10.2337/diabetes.50.8.1828 · DOI
  6. 10.2337/diab.45.11.1585 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/BF02658507 · DOI
  8. 10.2337/diabetes.51.7.2170 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1007/s001250051281 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s001250050046 · DOI
  11. 10.2337/diacare.23.5.589 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/BF00275741 · DOI
  13. 10.1056/NEJM198805123181902 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.2337/diabetes.50.3.614 · DOI
  15. 10.1530/eje.0.1430681 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/s001250051131 · DOI
  17. Samaras K, Spector TD, Nguyen TV, Baan K, Campbell LV, and Kelly PJ. Independent genetic factors determine the amount and distribution of fat in women after the menopause. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82: 781–785, 1997. · DOI
  18. 10.1007/s001250051107 · DOI
  19. 10.2337/diacare.18.7.1020 · DOI
  20. 10.1172/JCI716 · DOI
  21. 10.2337/diab.45.4.478 · DOI
  22. 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00624.x · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Tripathy, D., Lindholm, E., Isomaa, B., Saloranta, C., Tuomi, T., & Groop, L.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
Published
2003-12
Volume
285
Issue
6
Pages
E1297-E1303
ISSN
  • 0193-1849 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1555
OpenAlex
W2080081169
Cited by
20
References
40
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, familial risk, first-degree relatives, age of onset, waist-to-hip ratio, abdominal obesity, insulin resistance, insulin secretion, insulin sensitivity, disposition index, metabolic syndrome, glucose uptake
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Finland, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Phenotype, Sweden, Comorbidity, Body Mass Index, Age of Onset, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Metabolic Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review