Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 201

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of dietary fat types on body fatness, leptin, and ARC leptin receptor, NPY, and AgRP mRNA expression

Wang, Hongqin, Storlien, Len H., Huang, Xu-Feng·2002·American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism

Abstract

Some, but not all, fats are obesogenic. The aim of the present studies was to investigate the effects of changing type and amount of dietary fats on energy balance, fat deposition, leptin, and leptin-related neural peptides: leptin receptor, neuropeptide Y (NPY), agouti-related peptide (AgRP), and proopiomelanocortin (POMC), in C57Bl/6J mice. One week of feeding with a highly saturated fat diet resulted in ∼50 and 20% reduction in hypothalamic arcuate NPY and AgRP mRNA levels, respectively, compared with a low-fat or an n-3 or n-6 polyunsaturated high-fat (PUFA) diet without change in energy intake, fat mass, plasma leptin levels, and leptin receptor or POMC mRNA. Similar neuropeptide results were seen at 7 wk, but by then epididymal fat mass and plasma leptin levels were significantly elevated in the saturated fat group compared with low-fat controls. In contrast, fat and leptin levels were reduced in the n-3 PUFA group compared with all other groups. At 7 wk, changing the saturated fat group to n-3 PUFA for 4 wk completely reversed the hyperleptinemia and increased adiposity and neuropeptide changes induced by saturated fat. Changing to a low-fat diet was much less effective. In summary, a highly saturated fat diet induces obesity without hyperphagia. A regulatory reduction in NPY and AgRP mRNA levels is unable to effectively counteract this obesogenic drive. Equally high fat diets emphasizing PUFAs may even protect against obesity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpendo.00230.2001

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. 10.1016/S0899-9007(00)00410-X · DOI
  2. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1997.tb51833.x · DOI
  3. 10.1016/S0952-3278(97)90494-4 · DOI
  4. 10.1126/science.274.5293.1704 · DOI
  5. 10.1152/ajpregu.1994.266.5.R1578 · DOI
  6. 10.1097/00001756-199810260-00015 · DOI
  7. 10.1006/bbrc.1999.0675 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02580-4 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1038/5070 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/0026-0495(95)90028-4 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/S0169-328X(96)00174-X · DOI
  12. 10.1016/S0014-5793(96)01525-6 · DOI
  13. 10.2337/diab.47.2.294 · DOI
  14. 10.1210/endo.140.2.6491 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/13514 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.2337/diab.46.12.2119 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1101/gad.11.5.593 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S0304-3940(98)00678-8 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0006-8993(98)00551-4 · DOI
  20. 10.2337/diab.46.3.335 · DOI

Cited by

See all 201

Metadata

Authors
Wang, H., Storlien, L. H., & Huang, X.-F.
Affiliations
Metabolic Research Center, Department of Biomedical Science, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
Published
2002-06-01
Volume
282
Issue
6
Pages
E1352-E1359
ISSN
  • 0193-1849
  • 1522-1555
Cited by
201
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.