Whey protein effects on energy balance link the intestinal mechanisms of energy absorption with adiposity and hypothalamic neuropeptide gene expression
Open accessAbstract
We tested the hypothesis that dietary whey protein isolate (WPI) affects the intestinal mechanisms related to energy absorption and that the resulting energy deficit is compensated by changes in energy balance to support growth. C57BL/6 mice were provided a diet enriched with WPI with varied sucrose content, and the impact on energy balance-related parameters was investigated. As part of a high-sucrose diet, WPI reduced the hypothalamic expression of pro-opiomelanocortin gene expression and increased energy intake. The energy expenditure was unaffected, but epididymal weight was reduced, indicating an energy loss. Notably, there was a reduction in the ileum gene expression for amino acid transporter SLC6a19, glucose transporter 2, and fatty acid transporter 4. The composition of the gut microbiota also changed, where Firmicutes were reduced. The above changes indicated reduced energy absorption through the intestine. We propose that this mobilized energy in the adipose tissue and caused hypothalamic changes that increased energy intake, acting to counteract the energy deficit arising in the intestine. Lowering the sucrose content in the WPI diet increased energy expenditure. This further reduced epididymal weight and plasma leptin, whereupon hypothalamic ghrelin gene expression and the intestinal weight were both increased. These data suggest that when the intestine-adipose-hypothalamic pathway is subjected to an additional energy loss (now in the adipose tissue), compensatory changes attempt to assimilate more energy. Notably, WPI and sucrose content interact to enable the component mechanisms of this pathway.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A negative correlation between Firmicutes and ghrelin levels was observed both in humans and rodents.
“A negative correlation between Firmicutes and ghrelin levels was observed both in humans and rodents [322,323].”
From Anxiety, depression, and the microbiome: A role for gut peptides (2018) · cites this paper as [322]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 32
- Authors
- Nilaweera, K. N., Cabrera-Rubio, R., Speakman, J. R., O’Connor, P. M., McAuliffe, A., Guinane, C. M., Lawton, E. M., Crispie, F., Aguilera, M., Stanley, M., Boscaini, S., Joyce, S., Melgar, S., Cryan, J. F., & Cotter, P. D.
- Affiliations
- Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority (IE)
- Food Biosciences Department, Teagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, County Cork, Ireland;
- University of Aberdeen (GB)
- University College Cork (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Nilaweera, Kanishka N.
- ORCID
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2017-07-01
- Volume
- 313
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- E1-E11
- ISSN
- 0193-1849 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1555
- OpenAlex
- W2599673703
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5
- FWCI
- 3.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (acceptedVersion)
- T-Stór (Teagasc) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Funders
- Teagasc (0002MD)
- Science Fundation Ireland (SFI/12/RC/2273)
- Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) (SFI/16/BBSRC/3389)
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) (BB/P009875/1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Keywords
- whey protein isolate, energy balance, energy absorption, hypothalamic neuropeptides, proopiomelanocortin, ghrelin, leptin, gut microbiota, Firmicutes, SLC6A19, GLUT2, epididymal adipose tissue, energy expenditure, high-sucrose diet, adiposity
- MeSH terms
- Whey Proteins, Administration, Oral, Animals, Energy Intake, Dietary Proteins, Energy Metabolism, Gene Expression Regulation, Hypothalamus, Intestinal Absorption, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neuropeptides, Adiposity, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review