Cited by 96Neuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyPancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes Treatment and Management

Somatostatin-28 regulates GLP-1 secretion via somatostatin receptor subtype 5 in rat intestinal cultures

Chisholm, Connie, Greenberg, Gordon R.·2002·American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism

Abstract

Five somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) bind somatostatin-14 (S-14) and somatostatin-28 (S-28), but SSTR5 has the highest affinity for S-28. To determine whether S-28 acting through SSTR5 mediates inhibition of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), fetal rat intestinal cell cultures were treated with somatostatin analogs with relatively high specificity for SSTRs 2-5. S-28 dose-dependently inhibited GLP-1 secretion stimulated by gastrin-releasing peptide more potently than S-14 (EC(50) 0.01 vs. 5.8 nM). GLP-1 secretion was inhibited by an SSTR5 analog, BIM-23268, more potently than S-14 and nearly as effectively as S-28. The SSTR5 analog L-372,588 also suppressed GLP-1 secretion equivalent to S-28, but a structurally similar peptide, L-362,855 (Tyr to Phe at position 7), was ineffective. An SSTR2-selective analog was less effective than S-28, and an SSTR3 analog was inactive. Separate treatment with GLP-1-(7-36)-NH(2) increased S-28 and S-14 secretion by three- and fivefold; BIM-23268 abolished S-28 without altering S-14, whereas the SSTR2 analog was inactive. The results indicate that somatostatin regulation of GLP-1 secretion occurs via S-28 through activation of SSTR5. GLP-1-stimulated S-28 secretion is also autoregulated by SSTR5 activation, suggesting a feedback loop between GLP-1 and S-28 modulated by SSTR5.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpendo.00434.2001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 44 · Cited by 96

Authors
Chisholm, C., & Greenberg, G. R.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
Published
2002-08-01
Volume
283
Issue
2
Pages
E311-E317
ISSN
  • 0193-1849 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1555
OpenAlex
W2137445871
Cited by
96
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
somatostatin-28, somatostatin-14, somatostatin receptor 5, glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion, intestinal endocrine cells, gastrin-releasing peptide, somatostatin analogues, autocrine regulation, rat intestine
MeSH terms
Animals, Cells, Cultured, Glucagon-Like Peptides, Fetus, Glucagon, Intestinal Mucosa, Intestines, Peptide Fragments, Protein Precursors, Somatostatin, Receptors, Somatostatin, Rats, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1, Somatostatin-28

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review