Somatostatin-28 regulates GLP-1 secretion via somatostatin receptor subtype 5 in rat intestinal cultures
Abstract
Five somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) bind somatostatin-14 (S-14) and somatostatin-28 (S-28), but SSTR5 has the highest affinity for S-28. To determine whether S-28 acting through SSTR5 mediates inhibition of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), fetal rat intestinal cell cultures were treated with somatostatin analogs with relatively high specificity for SSTRs 2-5. S-28 dose-dependently inhibited GLP-1 secretion stimulated by gastrin-releasing peptide more potently than S-14 (EC(50) 0.01 vs. 5.8 nM). GLP-1 secretion was inhibited by an SSTR5 analog, BIM-23268, more potently than S-14 and nearly as effectively as S-28. The SSTR5 analog L-372,588 also suppressed GLP-1 secretion equivalent to S-28, but a structurally similar peptide, L-362,855 (Tyr to Phe at position 7), was ineffective. An SSTR2-selective analog was less effective than S-28, and an SSTR3 analog was inactive. Separate treatment with GLP-1-(7-36)-NH(2) increased S-28 and S-14 secretion by three- and fivefold; BIM-23268 abolished S-28 without altering S-14, whereas the SSTR2 analog was inactive. The results indicate that somatostatin regulation of GLP-1 secretion occurs via S-28 through activation of SSTR5. GLP-1-stimulated S-28 secretion is also autoregulated by SSTR5 activation, suggesting a feedback loop between GLP-1 and S-28 modulated by SSTR5.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Somatostatin inhibition of GLP-1 secretion is mediated via activation of the somatostatin receptor subtype (sst) 5, with a lesser effect through sst2.
“Somatostatin inhibition of GLP-1 secretion is mediated via activation of the somatostatin receptor subtype (sst) 5, with a lesser effect through sst2 (79).”
From Dumping syndrome after esophageal, gastric or bariatric surgery: Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management (2017) · cites this paper as [79]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 44 · Cited by 96
- Authors
- Chisholm, C., & Greenberg, G. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2002-08-01
- Volume
- 283
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- E311-E317
- ISSN
- 0193-1849 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1555
- OpenAlex
- W2137445871
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Keywords
- somatostatin-28, somatostatin-14, somatostatin receptor 5, glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion, intestinal endocrine cells, gastrin-releasing peptide, somatostatin analogues, autocrine regulation, rat intestine
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cells, Cultured, Glucagon-Like Peptides, Fetus, Glucagon, Intestinal Mucosa, Intestines, Peptide Fragments, Protein Precursors, Somatostatin, Receptors, Somatostatin, Rats, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1, Somatostatin-28
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review