Cited by 247Muscle metabolism and nutritionCardiovascular and exercise physiologyExercise and Physiological Responses

Effect of exercise and recovery on muscle protein synthesis in human subjects

Carraro, F., Stuart, C. A., Hartl, W. H., Rosenblatt, J., Wolfe, R. R.·1990·American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism

Abstract

Previous studies using indirect means to assess the response of protein metabolism to exercise have led to conflicting conclusions. Therefore, in this study we have measured the rate of muscle protein synthesis in normal volunteers at rest, at the end of 4 h of aerobic exercise (40% maximal O2 consumption), and after 4 h of recovery by determining directly the rate of incorporation of 1,2-[13C]leucine into muscle. The rate of muscle protein breakdown was assessed by 3-methylhistidine (3-MH) excretion, and total urinary nitrogen excretion was also measured. There was an insignificant increase in 3-MH excretion in exercise of 37% and a significant increase (P less than 0.05) of 85% during 4 h of recovery from exercise (0.079 +/- 0.008 vs. 0.147 +/- 0.0338 mumol.kg-1.min-1 for rest and recovery from exercise, respectively). Nonetheless, there was no effect of exercise on total nitrogen excretion. Muscle fractional synthetic rate was not different in the exercise vs. the control group at the end of exercise (0.0417 +/- 0.004 vs. 0.0477 +/- 0.010%/h for exercise vs. control), but there was a significant increase in fractional synthetic rate in the exercise group during the recovery period (0.0821 +/- 0.006 vs. 0.0654 +/- 0.012%/h for exercise vs. control, P less than 0.05). Thus we conclude that although aerobic exercise may stimulate muscle protein breakdown, this does not result in a significant depletion of muscle mass because muscle protein synthesis is stimulated in recovery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpendo.1990.259.4.e470

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 1 · Cited by 247

Authors
Carraro, F., Stuart, C. A., Hartl, W. H., Rosenblatt, J., & Wolfe, R. R.
Affiliations
Shriners Hospitals for Children - Galveston (US)
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
Published
1990-10-01
Volume
259
Issue
4
Pages
E470-E476
ISSN
  • 0193-1849 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1555
OpenAlex
W2171373691
Cited by
247
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Use Siena air (University of Siena) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (MO1-R00073)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK-38010, R01DK038010)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
muscle protein synthesis, muscle protein degradation, aerobic exercise, post-exercise recovery, urinary nitrogen excretion, fractional synthesis rate, muscle mass, protein metabolism
MeSH terms
Adult, Biopsy, Carbon Isotopes, Carbon Radioisotopes, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Physical Exertion, Humans, Isotope Labeling, Leucine, Mathematics, Models, Theoretical, Muscle Proteins, Muscles, Radioisotope Dilution Technique, Reference Values, Tritium

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review