Effect of exercise and recovery on muscle protein synthesis in human subjects
Abstract
Previous studies using indirect means to assess the response of protein metabolism to exercise have led to conflicting conclusions. Therefore, in this study we have measured the rate of muscle protein synthesis in normal volunteers at rest, at the end of 4 h of aerobic exercise (40% maximal O2 consumption), and after 4 h of recovery by determining directly the rate of incorporation of 1,2-[13C]leucine into muscle. The rate of muscle protein breakdown was assessed by 3-methylhistidine (3-MH) excretion, and total urinary nitrogen excretion was also measured. There was an insignificant increase in 3-MH excretion in exercise of 37% and a significant increase (P less than 0.05) of 85% during 4 h of recovery from exercise (0.079 +/- 0.008 vs. 0.147 +/- 0.0338 mumol.kg-1.min-1 for rest and recovery from exercise, respectively). Nonetheless, there was no effect of exercise on total nitrogen excretion. Muscle fractional synthetic rate was not different in the exercise vs. the control group at the end of exercise (0.0417 +/- 0.004 vs. 0.0477 +/- 0.010%/h for exercise vs. control), but there was a significant increase in fractional synthetic rate in the exercise group during the recovery period (0.0821 +/- 0.006 vs. 0.0654 +/- 0.012%/h for exercise vs. control, P less than 0.05). Thus we conclude that although aerobic exercise may stimulate muscle protein breakdown, this does not result in a significant depletion of muscle mass because muscle protein synthesis is stimulated in recovery.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Exercise-induced increases in muscle protein synthesis sensitize muscle insulin action and promote anabolism.
“Increased muscle protein synthesis with exercise sensitizes muscle insulin action and promotes anabolism96–100.”
From Sarcopenic obesity in older adults: aetiology, epidemiology and treatment strategies (2018) · cites this paper as [96]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 1 · Cited by 247
- Authors
- Carraro, F., Stuart, C. A., Hartl, W. H., Rosenblatt, J., & Wolfe, R. R.
- Affiliations
- Shriners Hospitals for Children - Galveston (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1990-10-01
- Volume
- 259
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- E470-E476
- ISSN
- 0193-1849 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1555
- OpenAlex
- W2171373691
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Use Siena air (University of Siena) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Public Health Service (MO1-R00073)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK-38010, R01DK038010)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
- Keywords
- muscle protein synthesis, muscle protein degradation, aerobic exercise, post-exercise recovery, urinary nitrogen excretion, fractional synthesis rate, muscle mass, protein metabolism
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Biopsy, Carbon Isotopes, Carbon Radioisotopes, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Physical Exertion, Humans, Isotope Labeling, Leucine, Mathematics, Models, Theoretical, Muscle Proteins, Muscles, Radioisotope Dilution Technique, Reference Values, Tritium
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review