Cited by 139Bone Metabolism and DiseasesBone health and osteoporosis researchGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors

Osteocytic expression of mRNA for c-fos and IGF-I: an immediate early gene response to an osteogenic stimulus

Lean, J. M., Mackay, A. G., Chow, J. W., Chambers, T. J.·1996·American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism

Abstract

We analyzed the expression, during the osteogenic response of bone to mechanical stimulation, of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), a growth factor implicated in bone formation, and c-fos, a protooncogene in which disordered regulation specifically affects bone. Both genes were strongly expressed in osteocytes of mechanically stimulated but not control bones within 30 min of the osteogenic stimulus. IGF-I mRNA expression increased up to 6 h, was restricted to osteocytes, and was strongly suppressed by indomethacin. Although early IGF-I mRNA expression was resistant to cycloheximide, there was a degree of suppression after 6 h, raising the possibility that IGF-I expression might be prolonged by autocrine mechanisms. c-fos mRNA was increased both in osteocytes and on bone surfaces. At both sites, c-fos expression was transient, prolonged by cycloheximide, and was strongly stimulated even in the presence of indomethacin. Thus osteocytes respond to mechanical stimulation with immediate prolonged expression of IGF-I and immediate transient expression of c-fos, implicating osteocytes in the osteogenic response to mechanical stimulation. Moreover, the different spatial distribution and indomethacin sensitivity of c-fos and IGF-I gene expression suggest that at least two signaling pathways are activated in osteocytes during this process.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpendo.1996.270.6.e937

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 139

Authors
Lean, J. M., Mackay, A. G., Chow, J. W., & Chambers, T. J.
Affiliations
St George's, University of London (GB)
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
Published
1996-06-01
Volume
270
Issue
6
Pages
E937-E945
ISSN
  • 0193-1849 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1555
OpenAlex
W2396608097
Cited by
139
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
Keywords
osteocytes, c-fos, insulin-like growth factor I, mechanical stimulation, osteogenic response, immediate early gene expression, indomethacin, cycloheximide, autocrine signaling, bone formation, gene expression regulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Cycloheximide, Female, Indomethacin, Insulin-Like Growth Factor I, Osteocytes, Osteogenesis, RNA, Messenger, Spine, Stress, Mechanical, Blotting, Northern, Gene Expression, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos, Rats, Wistar, In Situ Hybridization, Genes, Immediate-Early, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review