Reduced glucose effectiveness associated with reduced insulin release: an artifact of the minimal-model method
Abstract
We previously demonstrated that minimal model-derived estimates of glucose effectiveness (SG), based on the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (SGFSIGT), were reduced in islet-transplanted or streptozotocin-treated dogs and in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. To ascertain the validity of our observations, we compared SGFSIGT with estimates based on a basal hormone replacement glucose clamp (SGBRCLAMP) and a basal hormone replacement glucose tolerance test (SGBRGTT) in normal control (CNTL, n = 12) and streptozotocin-treated dogs with normal fasting plasma glucose (STZ-Rx, n = 9). SGFSIGT was reduced in STZ-Rx compared with CNTL (P < 0.05). However, neither SGBRCLAMP nor SGBRGTT was reduced in the STZ-Rx group (P > 0.05). Comparison of protocols for each subject indicated that SGFSIGT was greater than either SGBRCLAMP or SGBRGTT in control (P < 0.002) but not in STZ-Rx dogs (P > 0.1). The relationship of SGFSIGT to insulin secretory function suggests that our previous conclusion that SGFSIGT was reduced in subjects with limited insulin release may be an artifact of the minimal-model method. Our results suggest that caution must be exercised in the interpretation of differences in minimal-model estimates of SG between subject groups with significantly different levels of insulin secretory function.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The ability of the minimal model to accurately estimate glucose effectiveness is less certain.
“However, whereas a close correlation has been established between the glucose clamp-derived estimate of insulin action and the minimal model-derived insulin sensitivity index, the ability of the minimal model to accurately estimate glucose effectiveness is less certain (15,40).”
From Impaired basal glucose effectiveness but unaltered fasting glucose release and gluconeogenesis during short-term hypercortisolemia in healthy subjects (2004) · cites this paper as [15]
The cold minimal model in its original form provides an overestimate of glucose effectiveness when assessed in the presence of changing glucose concentrations.
“It has been demonstrated that the cold minimal model in its original form provides an overestimate of glucose effectiveness when assessed in the presence of changing glucose concentrations (15).”
From Impaired basal glucose effectiveness but unaltered fasting glucose release and gluconeogenesis during short-term hypercortisolemia in healthy subjects (2004) · cites this paper as [15]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Katz, A., Nambi, S. S., Mather, K., Baron, A. D., Follmann, D. A., Sullivan, G., & Quon, M. J. (2000) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem.85.7.6661 · Cited by 3,831 · see citing works
Ethnic Differences in the Relationship Between Insulin Sensitivity and Insulin Response
Kodama, K., Tojjar, D., Yamada, S., Toda, K., Patel, C. J., & Butte, A. J. (2013) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc12-1235 · Cited by 599 · see citing works
Diabetes: Models, Signals, and Control
Cobelli, C., Dalla Man, C., Sparacino, G., Magni, L., De Nicolao, G., & Kovatchev, B. P. (2009) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2009.2036073 · Cited by 511 · see citing works
Disposition Index, Glucose Effectiveness, and Conversion to Type 2 Diabetes
Lorenzo, C., Wagenknecht, L. E., Rewers, M. J., Karter, A. J., Bergman, R. N., Hanley, A. J. G., & Haffner, S. M. (2010) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc10-0165 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Loss of beta cell function as fasting glucose increases in the non-diabetic range
Godsland, I. F., Jeffs, J. A. R., & Johnston, D. G. (2004) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-004-1454-z · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Nielsen, M. F., Caumo, A., Chandramouli, V., Schumann, W. C., Cobelli, C., Landau, B. R., Vilstrup, H., Rizza, R. A., & Schmitz, O. (2004) · American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00566.2002 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Krudys, K. M., Dodds, M. G., Nissen, S. M., & Vicini, P. (2005) · American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00058.2004 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
- Authors
- Finegood, D. T., & Tzur, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1996-09-01
- Volume
- 271
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- E485-E495
- ISSN
- 0193-1849 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1555
- OpenAlex
- W2172957830
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 7.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- glucose effectiveness, insulin secretion, glucose tolerance test, glucose clamp, type 1 diabetes, islet transplantation, methodological artifacts
- MeSH terms
- Insulin Secretion, Animals, Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Dogs, Glucose, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Insulin, Models, Biological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review