Cited by 80Pancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Reduced glucose effectiveness associated with reduced insulin release: an artifact of the minimal-model method

Finegood, D. T., Tzur, D.·1996·American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism

Abstract

We previously demonstrated that minimal model-derived estimates of glucose effectiveness (SG), based on the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (SGFSIGT), were reduced in islet-transplanted or streptozotocin-treated dogs and in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. To ascertain the validity of our observations, we compared SGFSIGT with estimates based on a basal hormone replacement glucose clamp (SGBRCLAMP) and a basal hormone replacement glucose tolerance test (SGBRGTT) in normal control (CNTL, n = 12) and streptozotocin-treated dogs with normal fasting plasma glucose (STZ-Rx, n = 9). SGFSIGT was reduced in STZ-Rx compared with CNTL (P < 0.05). However, neither SGBRCLAMP nor SGBRGTT was reduced in the STZ-Rx group (P > 0.05). Comparison of protocols for each subject indicated that SGFSIGT was greater than either SGBRCLAMP or SGBRGTT in control (P < 0.002) but not in STZ-Rx dogs (P > 0.1). The relationship of SGFSIGT to insulin secretory function suggests that our previous conclusion that SGFSIGT was reduced in subjects with limited insulin release may be an artifact of the minimal-model method. Our results suggest that caution must be exercised in the interpretation of differences in minimal-model estimates of SG between subject groups with significantly different levels of insulin secretory function.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpendo.1996.271.3.e485

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Finegood, D. T., & Tzur, D.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
Published
1996-09-01
Volume
271
Issue
3
Pages
E485-E495
ISSN
  • 0193-1849 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1555
OpenAlex
W2172957830
Cited by
80
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
glucose effectiveness, insulin secretion, glucose tolerance test, glucose clamp, type 1 diabetes, islet transplantation, methodological artifacts
MeSH terms
Insulin Secretion, Animals, Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Dogs, Glucose, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Insulin, Models, Biological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review