Quantifying gluconeogenesis during fasting
Abstract
The use of 2 H 2 O in estimating gluconeogenesis’ contribution to glucose production (%GNG) was examined during progressive fasting in three groups of healthy subjects. One group ( n = 3) ingested 2 H 2 O to a body water enrichment of ≈0.35% 5 h into the fast. %GNG was determined at 2-h intervals from the ratio of the enrichments of the hydrogens at C-5 and C-2 of blood glucose, assayed in hexamethylenetetramine. %GNG increased from 40 ± 8% at 10 h to 93 ± 6% at 42 h. Another group ingested 2 H 2 O over 2.25 h, beginning at 11 h ( n = 7) and 19 h ( n = 7) to achieve ≈0.5% water enrichment. Enrichment in plasma water and at C-2 reached steady state ≈1 h after completion of 2 H 2 O ingestion. The C-5-to-C-2 ratio reached steady state by the completion of 2 H 2 O ingestion. %GNG was 54 ± 2% at 14 h and 64 ± 2% at 22 h. A 3-h [6,6-2 H 2]glucose infusion was also begun to estimate glucose production from enrichments at C-6, again in hexamethylenetetramine. Glucose produced by gluconeogenesis was 0.99 ± 0.06 mg ⋅ kg−1 ⋅ min−1 at both 14 and 22 h. In a third group ( n = 3) %GNG reached steady state ≈2 h after 2 H 2 O ingestion to only ≈0.25% enrichment. In conclusion, %GNG by 2 h after 2 H 2 O ingestion and glucose production using [6,6-2 H 2]glucose infusion, begun together, can be determined from hydrogen enrichments at blood glucose C-2, C-5, and C-6. %GNG increases gradually from the postabsorptive state to 42 h of fasting, without apparent change in the quantity of glucose produced by gluconeogenesis at 14 and 22 h.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Following a 14 h fast, gluconeogenesis contributed 54% to glucose production.
“as was shown with a 54% contribution to glucose production via gluconeogenesis following a 14 h fast [107].”
From Regulation of Energy Substrate Metabolism in Endurance Exercise (2021) · cites this paper as [107]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 20 · Cited by 154
- Authors
- Chandramouli, V., Ekberg, K., Schumann, W. C., Kalhan, S. C., Wahren, J., & Landau, B. R.
- Affiliations
- Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
- ORCID
- Kalhan, Satish C.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1997-12-01
- Volume
- 273
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- E1209-E1215
- ISSN
- 0193-1849 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1555
- OpenAlex
- W2103594738
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 3.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK-14507)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P-50-HD-11089, P50HD011089)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
- Keywords
- gluconeogenesis, fasting, glucose production, hexamethylenetetramine, glucose metabolism
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Blood Glucose, Deuterium, Fasting, Female, Gluconeogenesis, Glucose, Humans, Kinetics, Male, Radioisotope Dilution Technique, Deuterium Oxide
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review