Cited by 125Gastrointestinal motility and disordersCongenital gastrointestinal and neural anomaliesIon channel regulation and function

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Boundary cells between longitudinal and circular layers: essential for electrical slow waves in cat intestine

Suzuki, N., Prosser, C. L., Dahms, V.·1986·American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology

Abstract

Electrical slow waves were recorded by intracellular electrodes and by quasi-intracellular pressure and suction electrodes from muscle fibers at different levels in edgewise preparations of cat jejunum. Simultaneous recordings from longitudinal and circular muscle layers showed similar resting potentials from either muscle layer near the boundary zone, and lower resting potentials in cells of circular muscle near the submucosa. Slow waves were maximal in amplitude at the boundary between the two layers and spread electrotonically away from the boundary in both layers. Bipolar recordings were of opposite polarity on the two sides of the boundary. Amplitudes of slow waves from inner circular fibers were significantly lower than from outer circular fibers. Small strips of each muscle layer were prepared with or without the attached interstitial cells of Cajal plexus as identified by methylene blue staining. Either muscle layer showed slow waves from regions where interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) were observed after the recording. No slow waves were recorded from either layer from regions where ICC were not observed. Strips containing ICC but not strips lacking ICC could be driven electrically. Since blocking of neurons does not abolish slow waves and since regions of muscle lacking ICC do not have slow waves, it is concluded that the interstitial cells (ICC-I) are most likely the boundary elements essential for slow waves in either layer of intestinal muscle.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpgi.1986.250.3.g287

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The stomach generates its own rhythm, with cycles lasting about 20s in both humans and rodents.

    “Like the heart, the stomach generates its own rhythm 160,161 , with cycles lasting about 20s in both humans and rodents.”

    From Interoceptive rhythms in the brain (2023) · cites this paper as [161]

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Suzuki, N., Prosser, C. L., & Dahms, V.
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
Published
1986-03-01
Volume
250
Issue
3
Pages
G287-G294
ISSN
  • 0193-1857 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1547
OpenAlex
W2415331658
Cited by
125
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3
FWCI
8.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (5r01am027794-05)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Congenital gastrointestinal and neural anomalies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
Keywords
electrical slow waves, interstitial cells of Cajal, jejunum, circular muscle, longitudinal muscle, resting membrane potential, electrotonic spread, intestinal motility, cat intestine, methylene blue staining
MeSH terms
Animals, Cats, Electrodes, Electrophysiology, Female, Gastrointestinal Motility, Intestinal Mucosa, Jejunum, Male, Muscle Contraction, Muscle, Smooth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review