The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Physicochemical characteristics of emulsions during fat digestion in human stomach and duodenum
Abstract
Seven fasting subjects were fitted with nasogastric and nasoduodenal tubes and received intragastrically a coarsely emulsified test meal. Gastric and duodenal aspirates were collected after 1, 2, 3, and 4 h. In the duodenum, most lipids (> 90%) were present as emulsified droplets 1-100 microns in size. Large droplets and unemulsified material present in the test meal (> 100 micron) disappeared, whereas smaller droplets (1-50 microns) were generated after 1 h of digestion. Thus the median lipid droplet diameter significantly decreased (19.6 vs. 56.5 microns in the test meal) and the droplet surface area significantly increased (1.58 vs. 0.70 micron2/g fat). Intermediate droplet diameters were 34.3, 46.3, and 27.6 microns after 2, 3, and 4 h, respectively. In the stomach, a comparable emulsion particle size pattern was observed, with median droplet diameters of 17.2, 37.9, 52.4, and 41.6 microns after 1, 2, 3, and 4 h, respectively. However, the extent of triglyceride hydrolysis was much lower in the stomach (6-16%) than in the duodenum (42-45%), where small droplets were enriched in lipolytic products, cholesterol, and phospholipids. The present findings show for the first time that most dietary lipids are present in the human duodenum as emulsified droplets 1-50 microns in size and that no further marked emulsification of dietary fat occurs in the duodenum compared with the stomach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lipids and Lipid-Based Formulations: Optimizing the Oral Delivery of Lipophilic Drugs
Porter, C. J. H., Trevaskis, N. L., & Charman, W. N. (2007) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2197 · Cited by 1,824
Dissolution Media Simulating Conditions in the Proximal Human Gastrointestinal Tract: An Update
Jantratid, E., Janssen, N., Reppas, C., & Dressman, J. B. (2008) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1007/s11095-008-9569-4 · Cited by 764
Kalantzi, L., Goumas, K., Kalioras, V., Abrahamsson, B., Dressman, J. B., & Reppas, C. (2006) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1007/s11095-005-8476-1 · Cited by 658
Physiological Parameters for Oral Delivery and in Vitro Testing
Mudie, D. M., Amidon, G. L., & Amidon, G. E. (2010) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/mp100149j · Cited by 490
The triglyceride lipases of the pancreas
Lowe, M. E. (2002) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1194/jlr.r200012-jlr200 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Armand, M., Borel, P., Pasquier, B., Dubois, C., Senft, M., Andre, M., Peyrot, J., Salducci, J., & Lairon, D.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1996-07-01
- Volume
- 271
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- G172-G183
- ISSN
- 0193-1857 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1547
- OpenAlex
- W1832477011
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physicochemical characteristics of emulsions during fat digestion in human stomach and duodenum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/ajpgi.1996.271.1.g172
- The paper
- Armand, M., Borel, P., Pasquier, B., Dubois, C., Senft, M., Andre, M., Peyrot, J., Salducci, J., & Lairon, D. (1996). Physicochemical characteristics of emulsions during fat digestion in human stomach and duodenum. American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.1996.271.1.g172
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.