The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biochemical evaluation of the renin-angiotensin system: the good, bad, and absolute?
Open accessAbstract
The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) constitutes a key hormonal system in the physiological regulation of blood pressure through peripheral and central mechanisms. Indeed, dysregulation of the RAS is considered a major factor in the development of cardiovascular pathologies, and pharmacological blockade of this system by the inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) or antagonism of the angiotensin type 1 receptor (AT 1 R) offers an effective therapeutic regimen. The RAS is now defined as a system composed of different angiotensin peptides with diverse biological actions mediated by distinct receptor subtypes. The classic RAS comprises the ACE-ANG II-AT 1 R axis that promotes vasoconstriction; water intake; sodium retention; and increased oxidative stress, fibrosis, cellular growth, and inflammation. In contrast, the nonclassical RAS composed primarily of the ANG II/ANG III-AT 2 R and the ACE2-ANG-(1–7)-AT 7 R pathways generally opposes the actions of a stimulated ANG II-AT 1 R axis. In lieu of the complex and multifunctional aspects of this system, as well as increased concerns on the reproducibility among laboratories, a critical assessment is provided on the current biochemical approaches to characterize and define the various components that ultimately reflect the status of the RAS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Anderson, N. L., & Anderson, N. G. (2002) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.r200007-mcp200 · Cited by 4,414
Reproducibility crisis: Blame it on the antibodies
Baker, M. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/521274a · Cited by 830
Cited by
Endothelial Dysfunction and Hypertension
Konukoglu, D., & Uzun, H. (2016) · Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1007/5584_2016_90 · Cited by 594
Counter-regulatory renin–angiotensin system in cardiovascular disease
Paz Ocaranza, M., Riquelme, J. A., García, L., Jalil, J. E., Chiong, M., Santos, R. A. S., & Lavandero, S. (2020) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/s41569-019-0244-8 · Cited by 561
Li, X. C., Zhang, J., & Zhuo, J. L. (2017) · Pharmacological Research · doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2017.06.005 · Cited by 435
Metadata
- Authors
- Chappell, M. C.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2016-01-15
- Volume
- 310
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- H137-H152
- ISSN
- 0363-6135 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1539
- OpenAlex
- W2279350596
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biochemical evaluation of the renin-angiotensin system: the good, bad, and absolute? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/ajpheart.00618.2015
- The paper
- Chappell, M. C. (2016). Biochemical evaluation of the renin-angiotensin system: the good, bad, and absolute? American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00618.2015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.