The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estrogen receptor-β mediates male-female differences in the development of pressure overload hypertrophy
Abstract
The goal of this study was to determine the role of estrogen receptor subtypes in the development of pressure overload hypertrophy in mice. Epidemiological studies have suggested gender differences in the development of hypertrophy and heart disease, but the mechanism and the role of estrogen receptor subtypes are not established. We performed transverse aortic constriction (TAC) and sham operations in male and female wild-type (WT) mice and mice lacking functional estrogen receptor-α [α-estrogen receptor knockout (α-ERKO)] and mice lacking estrogen receptor-β (β-ERKO). Body, heart, and lung weights were measured 2 wk postsurgery. WT male mice subjected to TAC showed a 64% increase in the heart weight-to-body weight ratio (HW/BW) compared with sham, and WT males have increased lung weight at 2 wk. WT female mice subjected to TAC showed a 31% increase in HW/BW compared with sham, which was significantly less than their male counterparts and with no evidence of heart failure. α-ERKO females developed HW/BW nearly identical to that seen in WT littermate females in response to TAC, indicating that estrogen receptor-α is not essential for the attenuation of hypertrophy observed in WT females. In contrast, β-ERKO females responded to TAC with a significantly greater increase in HW/BW than WT littermate females. β-ERKO females have lower expression of lipoprotein lipase at baseline than WT or α-ERKO females. These data suggest an important role for estrogen receptor-β in attenuating the hypertrophic response to pressure overload in females.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Writing Group for the Women's Health Initiative Investigators (2002) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.288.3.321 · Cited by 15,889
Cited by
Bernardo, B. C., Weeks, K. L., Pretorius, L., & McMullen, J. R. (2010) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2010.04.005 · Cited by 894
Mechanistic Pathways of Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Disease
Regitz-Zagrosek, V., & Kararigas, G. (2017) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00021.2015 · Cited by 732
Cooke, P. S., Nanjappa, M. K., Ko, C., Prins, G. S., & Hess, R. A. (2017) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00018.2016 · Cited by 466
Gender differences in the cardiovascular effect of sex hormones
Vitale, C., Mendelsohn, M. E., & Rosano, G. M. C. (2009) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2009.105 · Cited by 368
Female sex and estrogen receptor-β attenuate cardiac remodeling and apoptosis in pressure overload
Fliegner, D., Schubert, C., Penkalla, A., Witt, H., Kararigas, G., Dworatzek, E., Staub, E., Martus, P., Noppinger, P. R., Kintscher, U., et al. (2010) · American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00825.2009 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Skavdahl, M., Steenbergen, C., Clark, J., Myers, P., Demianenko, T., Mao, L., Rockman, H. A., Korach, K. S., & Murphy, E.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 288
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- H469-H476
- ISSN
- 0363-6135 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1539
- OpenAlex
- W2106564874
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estrogen receptor-β mediates male-female differences in the development of pressure overload hypertrophy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/ajpheart.00723.2004
- The paper
- Skavdahl, M., Steenbergen, C., Clark, J., Myers, P., Demianenko, T., Mao, L., Rockman, H. A., Korach, K. S., & Murphy, E. (2005). Estrogen receptor-β mediates male-female differences in the development of pressure overload hypertrophy. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00723.2004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.