Cited by 60Cellular Mechanics and InteractionsCell Adhesion Molecules ResearchProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling

Poldip2 controls vascular smooth muscle cell migration by regulating focal adhesion turnover and force polarization

Open access
Datla, Srinivasa Raju, McGrail, Daniel J., Vukelic, Sasa, Huff, Lauren P., Lyle, Alicia N., Pounkova, Lily, Lee, Minyoung, Seidel-Rogol, Bonnie +6 more·2014·American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology

Abstract

Polymerase-δ-interacting protein 2 (Poldip2) interacts with NADPH oxidase 4 (Nox4) and regulates migration; however, the precise underlying mechanisms are unclear. Here, we investigated the role of Poldip2 in focal adhesion turnover, as well as traction force generation and polarization. Poldip2 overexpression (AdPoldip2) in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) impairs PDGF-induced migration and induces a characteristic phenotype of long cytoplasmic extensions. AdPoldip2 also prevents the decrease in spreading and increased aspect ratio observed in response to PDGF and slightly impairs cell contraction. Moreover, AdPoldip2 blocks focal adhesion dissolution and sustains H 2 O 2 levels in focal adhesions, whereas Poldip2 knockdown (siPoldip2) significantly decreases the number of focal adhesions. RhoA activity is unchanged when focal adhesion dissolution is stimulated in control cells but increases in AdPoldip2-treated cells. Inhibition of RhoA blocks Poldip2-mediated attenuation of focal adhesion dissolution, and overexpression of RhoA or focal adhesion kinase (FAK) reverses the loss of focal adhesions induced by siPoldip2, indicating that RhoA and FAK mediate the effect of Poldip2 on focal adhesions. Nox4 silencing prevents focal adhesion stabilization by AdPoldip2 and induces a phenotype similar to siPoldip2, suggesting a role for Nox4 in Poldip2-induced focal adhesion stability. As a consequence of impaired focal adhesion turnover, PDGF-treated AdPoldip2 cells are unable to reduce and polarize traction forces, a necessary first step in migration. These results implicate Poldip2 in VSMC migration via regulation of focal adhesion turnover and traction force generation in a Nox4/RhoA/FAK-dependent manner.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpheart.00918.2013

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The protein polymerase delta-interacting protein 2 (poldip2) seems to exert regulatory effects on NOX4.

    “The protein polymerase delta–interacting protein 2 (poldip2) seems to exert regulatory effects on NOX4 (212, 607), although poldip2 is involved on many other pathways (316).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 60

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [28]Mackay DJG, Hall A. Rho GTPases. J Biol Chem 273: 20685–20688, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Authors
Datla, S. R., McGrail, D. J., Vukelic, S., Huff, L. P., Lyle, A. N., Pounkova, L., Lee, M., Seidel-Rogol, B., Khalil, M. K., Hilenski, L. L., Terada, L. S., Dawson, M. R., Lassègue, B., & Griendling, K. K.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering and
  • Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta;
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Griendling, Kathy K.
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
Published
2014-10-01
Volume
307
Issue
7
Pages
H945-H957
ISSN
  • 0363-6135 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1539
OpenAlex
W2161585597
Cited by
60
References
51
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5
FWCI
3.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Georgia Institute of Technology
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL38206, HL058863, R37HL038206, HL-092120, R01HL092120, R01HL058863)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Cell Adhesion Molecules Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Keywords
Poldip2, vascular smooth muscle cell migration, focal adhesion turnover, NOX4, RhoA, focal adhesion kinase, PDGF signaling, hydrogen peroxide, cell contraction, cell spreading
MeSH terms
NADPH Oxidase 4, Animals, Carrier Proteins, Cell Adhesion, Cell Movement, Hydrogen Peroxide, Muscle, Smooth, Vascular, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor, Cell Polarity, NADPH Oxidases, rhoA GTP-Binding Protein, Focal Adhesions, Myocytes, Smooth Muscle, Rats, Focal Adhesion Protein-Tyrosine Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review