The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Microvascular ischemia-reperfusion injury in striated muscle: significance of "reflow paradox"
Abstract
Ischemia-reperfusion (I/R)-induced microvascular injury is characterized by capillary “no-reflow” and reflow-associated events, termed “reflow paradox,” including leukocyte-endothelium interaction and increase in microvascular permeability. The major objectives of this study were 1) to elucidate the significance of reflow paradox after 4 h of tourniquet-induced ischemia in striated muscle and 2) to determine the role of reactive oxygen metabolites in the pathogenesis of reflow paradox-dependent microcirculatory alterations. By use of in vivo fluorescence microscopy in a striated muscle preparation of hamsters, leukocyte-endothelium interaction in postcapillary venules and macromolecular extravasation from capillaries and venules were quantified before ischemia and after 30 min, 2 h, and 24 h of reperfusion. I/R elicited marked enhancement (P < 0.01) of leukocyte rolling during initial reperfusion and a 20-fold increase of leukocyte adherence (P < 0.01) lasting for the entire postischemic reperfusion period (n = 7). These phenomena were accompanied by significant leakage (P< 0.01) of macromolecules from capillaries and in particular from postcapillary venules (n = 9). Both superoxide dismutase (SOD, 20 mg/kg body wt, n = 7) and allopurinol (50 mg/kg body wt, n = 7) were effective in attenuating I/R-induced leukocyte rolling and adherence. In addition, microvascular leakage was significantly reduced by allopurinol (n = 9) and completely abolished by SOD (n = 9) (P < 0.01). These results support the concept that reactive oxygen metabolites contribute to I/R-induced reflow paradox, resulting in leukocyte accumulation, adherence, and increase in microvascular permeability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kalogeris, T., Baines, C. P., Krenz, M., & Korthuis, R. J. (2016) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c160006 · Cited by 718
Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury Revisited: An Overview of the Latest Pharmacological Strategies
Soares, R. O. S., Losada, D. M., Jordani, M. C., Évora, P., & Castro-e-Silva, O. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20205034 · Cited by 408
Uric acid in chronic heart failure: a marker of chronic inflammation
Leyva, F. (1998) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1053/euhj.1998.1188 · Cited by 287
Inflammatory responses to ischemia, and reperfusion in skeletal muscle
Gute, D. C., Ishida, T., Yarimizu, K., & Korthius, R. J. (1998) · Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry · doi:10.1023/a:1006832207864 · Cited by 252
Müller, M. J., Vollmar, B., Friedl, H.-P., & Menger, M. D. (1996) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/0891-5849(96)00028-7 · Cited by 51
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Menger, M. D., Pelikan, S., Steiner, D., & Messmer, K.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1992-12-01
- Volume
- 263
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- H1901-H1906
- ISSN
- 0363-6135 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1539
- OpenAlex
- W1930828223
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microvascular ischemia-reperfusion injury in striated muscle: significance of "reflow paradox". https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/ajpheart.1992.263.6.h1901
- The paper
- Menger, M. D., Pelikan, S., Steiner, D., & Messmer, K. (1992). Microvascular ischemia-reperfusion injury in striated muscle: significance of "reflow paradox". American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.1992.263.6.h1901
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.