The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Differing sympathetic and vagal effects on atrial fibrillation in dogs: role of refractoriness heterogeneity
Abstract
Although sympathetic activation is believed to promote atrial fibrillation (AF), the effects of sympathetic stimulation on AF have not been systematically studied. In seven morphine-chloralose-anesthetized dogs, autonomic decentralization increased atrial effective refractory period (ERP) and reentrant wavelength (WL) and decreased the duration of AF induced by burst atrial pacing. Graded bilateral stellate ansa stimulation decreased ERP and WL to values similar to those before decentralization but did not return AF duration to predecentralization values. Sympathetic and bilateral vagal stimulation were adjusted in six additional dogs to produce similar effects on ERP and WL. Despite comparable effects on mean WL, the duration of AF was increased by vagal stimulation from 14 +/- 5 (control) to 372 +/- 96 s (P < 0.001) but was not altered significantly (26 +/- 10 s) by sympathetic stimulation. Vagal stimulation increased the variability in atrial refractoriness, as indicated by the standard deviation of ERP at seven atrial sites and of activation frequency during AF at 112 recording sites, whereas sympathetic stimulation had no significant effect on these indexes of ERP heterogeneity. We conclude that sympathetic stimulation is much less effective than vagal stimulation in promoting AF and that heterogeneity in atrial ERP may be important in determining the ability to sustain AF.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pathophysiological mechanisms of atrial fibrillation: a translational appraisal
Schotten, U., Verheule, S., Kirchhof, P., & Goette, A. (2011) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00031.2009 · Cited by 1,273
Pappone, C., Santinelli, V., Manguso, F., Vicedomini, G., Gugliotta, F., Augello, G., Mazzone, P., Tortoriello, V., Landoni, G., Zangrillo, A., et al. (2004) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000112641.16340.c7 · Cited by 1,018
Pharmacology of cardiac potassium channels
Tamargo, J. (2004) · Cardiovascular Research · doi:10.1016/j.cardiores.2003.12.026 · Cited by 466
Dobrev, D., Friedrich, A., Voigt, N., Jost, N., Wettwer, E., Christ, T., Knaut, M., & Ravens, U. (2005) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.105.575332 · Cited by 462
Dobrev, D., Graf, E., Wettwer, E., Himmel, H. M., Hála, O., Doerfel, C., Christ, T., Schüler, S., & Ravens, U. (2001) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/hc4601.099466 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, L., & Nattel, S.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1997-08-01
- Volume
- 273
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- H805-H816
- ISSN
- 0363-6135 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1539
- OpenAlex
- W1754352567
- Cited by
- 423
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differing sympathetic and vagal effects on atrial fibrillation in dogs: role of refractoriness heterogeneity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/ajpheart.1997.273.2.h805
- The paper
- Liu, L., & Nattel, S. (1997). Differing sympathetic and vagal effects on atrial fibrillation in dogs: role of refractoriness heterogeneity. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.1997.273.2.h805
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.