The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Role of capillaries in determining CBF reserve: new insights using myocardial contrast echocardiography
Abstract
To define the role of capillaries in the control of coronary blood flow (CBF) reserve, we developed a model of the coronary circulation and evaluated experimental data in its context. Our model comprised three compartments connected in series (arterial, capillary, and venous), each with its own resistance. The resistance in each vascular compartment was derived from the model based on hemodynamic data obtained in nine dogs during baseline and stenosis, both at rest and during hyperemia. The capillary hydrostatic pressure was assumed to be constant in all stages. Although in the absence of stenosis, the contribution of capillaries to total myocardial vascular resistance was only 25 ± 5% at rest, it increased to 75 ± 14% during hyperemia, despite the total myocardial vascular resistance decreasing by 51 ± 13%. In the presence of a noncritical stenosis, total myocardial vascular resistance decreased by 22 ± 10% at rest, with no change in capillary resistance. During hyperemia, total myocardial vascular resistance increased by 58 ± 50% in the presence of the noncritical stenosis. In this situation, because arteriolar and venular resistances were already minimal, the increase in myocardial vascular resistance was due to increased capillary resistance, making it the predominant source (84 ± 8%) of total myocardial vascular resistance. Myocardial video intensity (VI) on myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE), which reflects capillary blood volume, decreased distal to the stenosis during hyperemia. In the presence of a flow-limiting stenosis at rest, myocardial VI also decreased, indicating that decrease in CBF was associated with an increase in capillary resistance. Our findings also provide an alternative explanation for the critical coronary closing pressure. Thus, contrary to previously held notions, capillaries play a vital role in the regulation of CBF.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mohammed, S. F., Hussain, S., Mirzoyev, S. A., Edwards, W. D., Maleszewski, J. J., & Redfield, M. M. (2015) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.114.009625 · Cited by 874
Porter, T. R., Mulvagh, S. L., Abdelmoneim, S. S., Becher, H., Belcik, J. T., Bierig, M., Choy, J., Gaibazzi, N., Gillam, L. D., Janardhanan, R., et al. (2018) · Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography · doi:10.1016/j.echo.2017.11.013 · Cited by 432
Love, K. M., Liu, J., Regensteiner, J. G., Reusch, J. E. B., & Liu, Z. (2020) · Journal of Diabetes · doi:10.1111/1753-0407.13045 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Jayaweera, A. R., Wei, K., Coggins, M., Bin, J. P., Goodman, C., & Kaul, S.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1999-12-01
- Volume
- 277
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- H2363-H2372
- ISSN
- 0363-6135 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1539
- OpenAlex
- W2162795567
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role of capillaries in determining CBF reserve: new insights using myocardial contrast echocardiography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/ajpheart.1999.277.6.h2363
- The paper
- Jayaweera, A. R., Wei, K., Coggins, M., Bin, J. P., Goodman, C., & Kaul, S. (1999). Role of capillaries in determining CBF reserve: new insights using myocardial contrast echocardiography. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.1999.277.6.h2363
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.