Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 506

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Recent stereological methods for cell biology: a brief survey

Cruz-Orive, L. M., Weibel, E. R.·1990·American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology

Abstract

With the advent of many new tools over the last five years, stereology has become simpler, assumption-free, and more efficient but, at the same time, new terms and concepts have proliferated, which risk overwhelming potential users. The present review is intended to meet the urgent need for a structured classification and evaluation of the newest stereological methods. Being fairly comprehensive, the exposition is necessarily succinct: the reader is referred to selected references for the necessary details and examples.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajplung.1990.258.4.l148

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 506

Metadata

Authors
Cruz-Orive, L. M., & Weibel, E. R.
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
Published
1990-04-01
Volume
258
Issue
4
Pages
L148-L156
ISSN
  • 1040-0605 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1504
OpenAlex
W2272417159
Cited by
506
References
0
FWCI
27.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent stereological methods for cell biology: a brief survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/ajplung.1990.258.4.l148
The paper
Cruz-Orive, L. M., & Weibel, E. R. (1990). Recent stereological methods for cell biology: a brief survey. American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.1990.258.4.l148

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.