Cited by 77Muscle Physiology and DisordersExercise and Physiological ResponsesMuscle metabolism and nutrition

Importance of satellite cells in the strength recovery after eccentric contraction-induced muscle injury

Rathbone, Christopher R., Wenke, J. C., Warren, Gordon L., Armstrong, R. B.·2003·American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine if the elimination of satellite cell proliferation using gamma-irradiation would inhibit normal force recovery after eccentric contraction-induced muscle injury. Adult female ICR mice were implanted with a stimulating nerve cuff on the common peroneal nerve and assigned to one of four groups: 1) irradiation- and eccentric contraction-induced injury, 2) eccentric contraction-induced injury only, 3) irradiation only, and 4) no intervention. Anterior crural muscles were irradiated with a dose of 2,500 rad and injured with 150 in vivo maximal eccentric contractions. Maximal isometric torque was determined weekly through 35 days postinjury. Immediately after injury, maximal isometric torque was reduced by approximately 50% and had returned to normal by 28 days postinjury in the nonirradiated injured mice. However, torque production of irradiated injured animals did not recover fully and was 25% less than that of injured nonirradiated mice 35 days postinjury. These data suggest that satellite cell proliferation is required for approximately half of the force recovery after eccentric contraction-induced injury.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpregu.00032.2003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 77

Authors
Rathbone, C. R., Wenke, J. C., Warren, G. L., & Armstrong, R. B.
Affiliations
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • Georgia State University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
Published
2003-12
Volume
285
Issue
6
Pages
R1490-R1495
ISSN
  • 0363-6119 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1490
OpenAlex
W2019186388
Cited by
77
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
satellite cells, muscle regeneration, muscle strength recovery, gamma irradiation, satellite cell proliferation, isometric torque, peroneal nerve stimulation, skeletal muscle injury
MeSH terms
Animals, Body Weight, Cell Division, Female, Isometric Contraction, Mice, Inbred ICR, Organ Size, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Fibers, Skeletal, Torque, Recovery of Function, Satellite Cells, Skeletal Muscle, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review