Sleep efficiency and nocturnal hemodynamic dipping in young, normotensive adults
Abstract
Blunted dipping of nocturnal systolic arterial pressure (SAP) and heart rate (HR) are independent risk factors for hypertension and all-cause mortality. While several epidemiological studies report a significant association between short sleep duration and hypertension, associations between sleep efficiency and the nocturnal drop of SAP remain controversial. Moreover, relations between sleep efficiency and HR diurnal patterns have been overlooked. We hypothesized that low sleep efficiency (<85%) would be associated with blunted nocturnal SAP and HR dipping. Twenty-two normotensive subjects (13 men, 9 women; age: 18-28 yr) wore an actigraphy watch for 7 days and nights, and an ambulatory blood pressure monitor for 24 h on a nonactigraph night. There were no differences in age, sex, body mass index, mean sleep time, number of awakenings, or 24-h blood pressure between the low (n = 12) and high (n = 10) sleep efficiency groups. However, the low sleep efficiency subjects demonstrated a blunted dip of nocturnal SAP (10 ± 1% vs. 14 ± 1%, P = 0.04) and HR (12 ± 3% vs. 21 ± 3%, P = 0.03) compared with the high sleep efficiency group. The low sleep efficiency group also demonstrated a higher mean nocturnal HR (63 ± 2 vs. 55 ± 2 beats/min; P = 0.02). These findings support growing evidence that sleep efficiency, independent of total sleep time, may be an important cardiovascular risk factor.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a small study of 23 healthy young adults aged 18-28, those with average sleep efficiency <85% had a blunted nocturnal dip in systolic blood pressure compared to those with sleep efficiency ≥85%.
“They found that those with an average sleep efficiency <85% had a blunted nocturnal dip in systolic blood pressure compared to those with a sleep efficiency ≥85% [208].”
From Association between sleep deficiency and cardiometabolic disease: implications for health disparities (2016) · cites this paper as [208]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 39
- Authors
- Ross, A. J., Yang, H., Larson, R. A., & Carter, J. R.
- Affiliations
- Michigan Technological University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Carter, Jason R.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2014-10-01
- Volume
- 307
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- R888-R892
- ISSN
- 0363-6119 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1490
- OpenAlex
- W2010248445
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 4.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (Michigan Technological University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
- Keywords
- sleep efficiency, nocturnal blood pressure dipping, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, hypertension risk, cardiovascular risk factors, normotensive young adults, nocturnal heart rate
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Blood Pressure, Cardiovascular Diseases, Circadian Rhythm, Female, Heart Rate, Hemodynamics, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Risk Factors, Sleep, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review