Photoperiod differentially modulates photic and nonphotic phase response curves of hamsters
Abstract
Circadian pacemakers respond to light pulses with phase adjustments that allow for daily synchronization to 24-h light-dark cycles. In Syrian hamsters, Mesocricetus auratus, light-induced phase shifts are larger after entrainment to short daylengths (e.g., 10 h light:14 h dark) vs. long daylengths (e.g., 14 h light:10 h dark). The present study assessed whether photoperiodic modulation of phase resetting magnitude extends to nonphotic perturbations of the circadian rhythm and, if so, whether the relationship parallels that of photic responses. Male Syrian hamsters, entrained for 31 days to either short or long daylengths, were transferred to novel wheel running cages for 2 h at times spanning the entire circadian cycle. Phase shifts induced by this stimulus varied with the circadian time of exposure, but the amplitude of the resulting phase response curve was not markedly influenced by photoperiod. Previously reported photoperiodic effects on photic phase resetting were verified under the current paradigm using 15-min light pulses. Photoperiodic modulation of phase resetting magnitude is input specific and may reflect alterations in the transmission of photic stimuli.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Exposure to long periods of darkness may have stabilized the patient's mood through their known capacity to increase the magnitude of the circadian pacemaker's phase-resetting response to light and thereby to strengthen its coupling to the day-night cycle.
“In that schedule, exposure to the long periods of darkness may have stabilized his mood through their known capacity to increase the magnitude of the circadian pacemaker’s phase-resetting response to light and thereby to strengthen its coupling to the day–night cycle14,15.”
From Bipolar mood cycles associated with lunar entrainment of a circadian rhythm (2018) · cites this paper as [14]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 45
- Authors
- Evans, J. A., Elliott, J. A., & Gorman, M. R.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 286
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- R539-R546
- ISSN
- 0363-6119 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1490
- OpenAlex
- W1973058347
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- National Institutes of Health (5r01ns030235-03)
- University of California, San Diego
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-30235)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-36 460)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Keywords
- photoperiod, phase response curve, circadian pacemaker, golden hamster, day length, entrainment, wheel running, light pulses, circadian rhythm
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Circadian Rhythm, Cricetinae, Male, Mesocricetus, Motor Activity, Orchiectomy, Photic Stimulation, Testosterone, Photoperiod
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review