Role for CD14, TLR2, and TLR4 in bacterial product-induced anorexia
Abstract
The cell surface component CD14 and the toll-like receptors 2 and 4 (TLR2 and TLR4) are important in mediating the immune responses to bacterial products in mammals. Using mice genetically deficient in CD14, TLR2, or TLR4, we studied the role of these molecules in the anorectic effects of LPS and muramyl dipeptide (MDP). CD14 or TLR2 knockout (KO) and TLR4-deficient (TLR4-DEF) mice as well as corresponding wild-type (WT) colittermates were injected intraperitoneally at dark onset with LPS (2 microg/mouse), MDP (10 mg/kg), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta, 150 ng/mouse), or vehicle, and food intake was recorded. LPS and MDP reduced food intake in WT mice of all genotypes tested. The anorectic effect of LPS was attenuated (P < 0.04) in CD14-KO and TLR4-DEF mice but not in TLR2-KO (P > 0.05). The anorectic effect of MDP was blunted in CD14-KO and TLR2-KO (P < 0.02) mice but not in TLR4-DEF mice. IL-1 beta reduced food intake similarly in all genotypes tested. These results indicate that CD14 is involved in mediating the anorectic effects of both LPS and MDP. Furthermore, TLR4 and TLR2 are specifically involved in mediating the anorectic effects of LPS and MDP, respectively. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that TLR4 functions as the true LPS receptor and that TLR2 is involved in recognition of gram-positive bacterial products.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some animal data suggest that lipopolysaccharide directly initiates an anorexic response by activating the Toll-like receptor 4/MyD88 signaling pathway in the central nervous system, although it has also been proven otherwise.
“some animal data suggest that LPS directly initiates an anorexic response (i.e., inflammation-induced anorexia) by activating the Toll-like receptor 4/MyD88 signaling pathway in the central nervous system [42,43], although it has also been proven otherwise [44].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 47
- Authors
- von Meyenburg, C., Hrupka, B. H., Arsenijevic, D., Schwartz, G. J., Landmann, R., & Langhans, W.
- Affiliations
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US)
- University of Basel (CH)
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 287
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- R298-R305
- ISSN
- 0363-6119 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1490
- OpenAlex
- W2172195030
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Keywords
- CD14, TLR2, TLR4, anorexia, dietary intake, lipopolysaccharide, muramyl dipeptide, IL-1β, bacterial products, innate immunity, knockout mice, LPS receptor
- MeSH terms
- Acetylmuramyl-Alanyl-Isoglutamine, Adjuvants, Immunologic, Animals, Anorexia, Eating, Injections, Intraperitoneal, Interleukin-1, Lipopolysaccharides, Male, Membrane Glycoproteins, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Receptors, Cell Surface, Mice, Knockout, Lipopolysaccharide Receptors, Toll-Like Receptors, Toll-Like Receptor 2, Toll-Like Receptor 4, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review