Cited by 47Immune Response and InflammationRegulation of Appetite and ObesityNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Role for CD14, TLR2, and TLR4 in bacterial product-induced anorexia

von Meyenburg, C., Hrupka, B. H., Arsenijevic, D., Schwartz, G. J., Landmann, R., Langhans, W.·2004·American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology

Abstract

The cell surface component CD14 and the toll-like receptors 2 and 4 (TLR2 and TLR4) are important in mediating the immune responses to bacterial products in mammals. Using mice genetically deficient in CD14, TLR2, or TLR4, we studied the role of these molecules in the anorectic effects of LPS and muramyl dipeptide (MDP). CD14 or TLR2 knockout (KO) and TLR4-deficient (TLR4-DEF) mice as well as corresponding wild-type (WT) colittermates were injected intraperitoneally at dark onset with LPS (2 microg/mouse), MDP (10 mg/kg), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta, 150 ng/mouse), or vehicle, and food intake was recorded. LPS and MDP reduced food intake in WT mice of all genotypes tested. The anorectic effect of LPS was attenuated (P < 0.04) in CD14-KO and TLR4-DEF mice but not in TLR2-KO (P > 0.05). The anorectic effect of MDP was blunted in CD14-KO and TLR2-KO (P < 0.02) mice but not in TLR4-DEF mice. IL-1 beta reduced food intake similarly in all genotypes tested. These results indicate that CD14 is involved in mediating the anorectic effects of both LPS and MDP. Furthermore, TLR4 and TLR2 are specifically involved in mediating the anorectic effects of LPS and MDP, respectively. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that TLR4 functions as the true LPS receptor and that TLR2 is involved in recognition of gram-positive bacterial products.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpregu.00659.2003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 47

Authors
von Meyenburg, C., Hrupka, B. H., Arsenijevic, D., Schwartz, G. J., Landmann, R., & Langhans, W.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US)
  • University of Basel (CH)
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
Published
2004-08
Volume
287
Issue
2
Pages
R298-R305
ISSN
  • 0363-6119 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1490
OpenAlex
W2172195030
Cited by
47
References
49
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
CD14, TLR2, TLR4, anorexia, dietary intake, lipopolysaccharide, muramyl dipeptide, IL-1β, bacterial products, innate immunity, knockout mice, LPS receptor
MeSH terms
Acetylmuramyl-Alanyl-Isoglutamine, Adjuvants, Immunologic, Animals, Anorexia, Eating, Injections, Intraperitoneal, Interleukin-1, Lipopolysaccharides, Male, Membrane Glycoproteins, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Receptors, Cell Surface, Mice, Knockout, Lipopolysaccharide Receptors, Toll-Like Receptors, Toll-Like Receptor 2, Toll-Like Receptor 4, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review