Cited by 103Circadian rhythm and melatoninHypothalamic control of reproductive hormonesOvarian function and disorders

Circadian rhythm changes in core temperature over the menstrual cycle: method for noninvasive monitoring

Coyne, Mary D., Kesick, Christina M., Doherty, Tammy J., Kolka, Margaret A., Stephenson, Lou A.·2000·American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether core temperature (T c) telemetry could be used in ambulatory women to track changes in the circadian T c rhythm during different phases of the menstrual cycle and, more specifically, to detect impending ovulation. T c was measured in four women who ingested a series of disposable temperature sensors. Data were collected each minute for 2–7 days and analyzed in 36-h segments by automated cosinor analysis to determine the mesor (mean temperature), amplitude, period, acrophase (time of peak temperature), and predicted circadian minimum core temperature (T c-min) for each cycle. The T c mesor was higher ( P ≤ 0.001) in the luteal (L) phase (37.39 ±0.13°C) and lower in the preovulatory (P) phase (36.91 ±0.11°C) compared with the follicular (F) phase (37.08 ±0.13°C). The predicted T c-min was also greater in L (37.06 ± 0.14°C) than in menses (M; 36.69 ± 0.13°C), F (36.6 ± 0.16°C), and P (36.38 ± 0.08°C) ( P ≤ 0.0001). During P, the predicted T c-min was significantly decreased compared with M and F ( P ≤ 0.0001). The amplitude of the T c rhythm was significantly reduced in L compared with all other phases ( P ≤ 0.005). Neither the period nor acrophase was affected by menstrual cycle phase in ambulatory subjects. The use of an ingestible temperature sensor in conjunction with fast and accurate cosinor analysis provides a noninvasive method to mark menstrual phases, including the critical preovulatory period.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpregu.2000.279.4.r1316

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most studies that confirmed ovulatory cycles found that the nocturnal decline in core body temperature is blunted, reducing the amplitude of the daily temperature rhythm in the luteal phase compared with the follicular phase.

    “the nocturnal decline in core body temperature is blunted, reducing the amplitude of the daily temperature rhythm in the luteal phase compared with the follicular phase (Figure 2; 35,65-75).”
  • Most studies that confirmed ovulatory cycles found that mean or mesor core body temperature is increased in the luteal phase compared with the follicular phase.

    “Most studies that confirmed the presence of ovulatory cycles found that the mean or mesor core body temperature is increased”
  • In ambulatory women with normal ovulatory menstrual cycles, mean and minimum 24-h core body temperature were at their lowest during the preovulatory phase, coincident with the estrogen surge.

    “mean and minimum 24-h core body temperature were at their lowest during the preovulatory phase, coincident with the estrogen surge, in women tracked across several phases of the menstrual cycle [35].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 19 · Cited by 103

Authors
Coyne, M. D., Kesick, C. M., Doherty, T. J., Kolka, M. A., & Stephenson, L. A.
Affiliations
  • Wellesley College (US)
  • Thermal and Mountain Medicine Division, and
  • U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine (US)
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
Published
2000-10-01
Volume
279
Issue
4
Pages
R1316-R1320
ISSN
  • 0363-6119 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1490
OpenAlex
W2178009883
Cited by
103
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
Keywords
core body temperature, circadian rhythm, menstrual cycle, ovulation prediction, cosinor analysis, luteal phase, follicular phase, preovulatory phase, non-invasive monitoring
MeSH terms
Adult, Automation, Body Temperature, Body Temperature Regulation, Circadian Rhythm, Female, Follicular Phase, Humans, Luteinizing Hormone, Luteal Phase, Menstrual Cycle, Menstruation, Monitoring, Physiologic, Ovulation, Telemetry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review