Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 193

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Protection of transplant-induced renal ischemia-reperfusion injury with carbon monoxide

Neto, Joao Seda, Nakao, Atsunori, Kimizuka, Kei, Romanosky, Anna Jeanine, Stolz, Donna B., Uchiyama, Takashi, Nalesnik, Michael A., Otterbein, Leo E., Murase, Noriko·2004·American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology

Abstract

Carbon monoxide (CO), a product of heme metabolism by heme oxygenases, is known to impart protection against oxidative stress. We hypothesized that CO would protect ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury of transplanted organs, and the efficacy of CO was studied in the rat kidney transplantation model. A Lewis rat kidney graft, preserved in University of Wisconsin solution at 4°C for 24 h, was orthotopically transplanted into syngeneic rats. Recipients were maintained in room air or exposed to CO (250 ppm) in air for 1 h before and 24 h after transplantation. Animals were killed 1, 3, 6, and 24 h after transplantation to assess efficacy of inhaled CO. Rapid upregulation of mRNA for IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α, ICAM-1, heme oxygenase-1, and inducible nitric oxide synthase was observed within 3 h after transplantation in the control grafts of air-exposed recipients, associating with histopathological evidences of acute tubular necrosis, interstitial hemorrhage, and edema. In contrast, the increase of inflammatory mediators was markedly inhibited in kidney grafts of CO-treated recipients, which correlated with improved renal cortical blood flow. Further detailed morphological analyses revealed that CO preserved the glomerular vascular architecture and podocyte viability with less apoptosis of tubular epithelial cells and less ED1+macrophage infiltration. CO inhalation resulted in improved serum creatinine levels and clearance, and animal survival was significantly improved with CO to 60.5 from 25 days in untreated controls. The study demonstrates that exposure of kidney graft recipients to CO at a low concentration can impart significant protective effects against renal I/R injury and improve function of renal grafts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajprenal.00158.2004

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 193

Metadata

Authors
Neto, J. S., Nakao, A., Kimizuka, K., Romanosky, A. J., Stolz, D. B., Uchiyama, T., Nalesnik, M. A., Otterbein, L. E., & Murase, N.
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology
Published
2004-11
Volume
287
Issue
5
Pages
F979-F989
ISSN
  • 1522-1466 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-857X
OpenAlex
W1988449494
Cited by
193
References
4
FWCI
4.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protection of transplant-induced renal ischemia-reperfusion injury with carbon monoxide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/ajprenal.00158.2004
The paper
Neto, J. S., Nakao, A., Kimizuka, K., Romanosky, A. J., Stolz, D. B., Uchiyama, T., Nalesnik, M. A., Otterbein, L. E., & Murase, N. (2004). Protection of transplant-induced renal ischemia-reperfusion injury with carbon monoxide. American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00158.2004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.