Cited by 44Parathyroid Disorders and TreatmentsRenal function and acid-base balanceKidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Increased renal dopamine and acute renal adaptation to a high-phosphate diet

Open access
Weinman, Edward J., Biswas, Rajatsubhra, Steplock, Deborah, Wang, Peili, Lau, Yuen-Sum, Desir, Gary V., Shenolikar, Shirish·2011·American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology

Abstract

The current experiments explore the role of dopamine in facilitating the acute increase in renal phosphate excretion in response to a high-phosphate diet. Compared with a low-phosphate (0.1%) diet for 24 h, mice fed a high-phosphate (1.2%) diet had significantly higher rates of phosphate excretion in the urine associated with a two- to threefold increase in the dopamine content of the kidney and in the urinary excretion of dopamine. Animals fed a high-phosphate diet had a significant increase in the abundance and activity of renal DOPA (l-dihydroxyphenylalanine) decarboxylase and significant reductions in renalase, monoamine oxidase A, and monoamine oxidase B. The activity of protein kinase A and protein kinase C, markers of activation of renal dopamine receptors, were significantly higher in animals fed a high-phosphate vs. a low-phosphate diet. Treatment of rats with carbidopa, an inhibitor of DOPA decarboxylase, impaired adaptation to a high-phosphate diet. These experiments indicate that the rapid adaptation to a high-phosphate diet involves alterations in key enzymes involved in dopamine synthesis and degradation, resulting in increased renal dopamine content and activation of the signaling cascade used by dopamine to inhibit the renal tubular reabsorption of phosphate.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajprenal.00744.2010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Berndt TJ, 1993, J Lab Clin Med, 22, 80
  2. Berndt TJ, 1994, Miner Electrolyte Metab, 20, 158
  3. 10.1073/pnas.0704446104 · DOI
  4. Bonjour JP, 1976, Curr Probl Clin Biochem, 6, 272
  5. 10.1152/ajpregu.00687.2009 · DOI
  6. 10.1359/jbmr.060507 · DOI
  7. Chan YL, 1976, J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 199, 17, 10.1016/S0022-3565(25)30651-8 · DOI
  8. 10.1074/jbc.M405893200 · DOI
  9. 10.1152/ajprenal.90426.2008 · DOI
  10. 10.1152/ajprenal.1994.266.6.F858 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1210/jc.2004-1039 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1152/ajprenal.1993.264.4.F618 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1073/pnas.182412699 · DOI
  14. 10.1097/MNH.0b013e32832b5094 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.neures.2005.04.010 · DOI
  16. 10.1152/ajprenal.1994.267.5.F900 · DOI
  17. Levine BS, 1984, Miner Electrolyte Metab, 10, 222
  18. 10.1677/JOE-07-0564 · DOI
  19. Lowry OH, 1951, J Biol Chem, 193, 265, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-6 · DOI
  20. 10.1152/ajprenal.1989.257.6.F967 · DOI
  21. 10.1159/000090219 · DOI
  22. 10.1073/pnas.162232699 · DOI
  23. 10.1042/bj1800465 · DOI
  24. 10.1172/JCI108277 · DOI
  25. 10.1152/ajprenal.00215.2003 · DOI
  26. 10.1172/JCI32738 · DOI
  27. 10.1172/JCI24066 · DOI
  28. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1982.tb10871.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Weinman, E. J., Biswas, R., Steplock, D., Wang, P., Lau, Y.-S., Desir, G. V., & Shenolikar, S.
Affiliations
  • Veterans Health Administration (US)
  • Departments of 1Medicine and
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Houston (US)
  • Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine and Department of Veterans Affairs Connecticut Health Care System Medical Center, West Haven, Connecticut; and
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
Weinman, Edward J.
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology
Published
2011-05
Volume
300
Issue
5
Pages
F1123-F1129
ISSN
  • 1522-1466 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-857X
OpenAlex
W2136293343
Cited by
44
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
7.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • National Institutes of Health (1rc1dk086402-01, 1rc1dk086465-01)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK 55881, R01DK055881, DK086402, DK081037, R01DK081037, DK086465)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Renal function and acid-base balance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Keywords
renal dopamine, high-phosphate diet, renal phosphate excretion, aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase, renalase, monoamine oxidase, protein kinase A, protein kinase C, carbidopa, phosphate reabsorption, kidney, dietary adaptation
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Carbidopa, Dopa Decarboxylase, Dopamine, Enzyme Inhibitors, Kidney, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Monoamine Oxidase, Protein Kinase C, Time Factors, Signal Transduction, Up-Regulation, Phosphorus, Dietary, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Cyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinases, Mice, Rats, Aromatic Amino Acid Decarboxylase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review