The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A muscarinic agonist inhibits reflex bronchoconstriction in normal but not in asthmatic subjects
Abstract
Muscarinic receptors of the M2 subtype, which inhibit acetylcholine release from cholinergic nerves (autoreceptors), have been described in animal and human bronchi in vitro. We investigated whether these receptors may be involved in feedback inhibition of cholinergic reflex bronchoconstriction induced by sulfur dioxide (SO2) in seven nonasthmatic atopic subjects and in six mild asthmatic subjects. In a control experiment, total respiratory resistance (Rrs) was increased by 30 +/- 5% in nonasthmatic and by 60 +/- 18% in asthmatic subjects. In nonasthmatic subjects, pilocarpine, an agonist of muscarinic M2-autoreceptors, increased Rrs by 15 +/- 5% and addition of SO2 increased Rrs to 21 +/- 5% above base line, which was not significantly greater than after pilocarpine alone. Histamine gave a comparable bronchoconstriction (25 +/- 3% increase in Rrs) and SO2 further increased Rrs to 39 +/- 6% above base line (P less than 0.05). Thus pilocarpine appears to inhibit SO2-induced bronchoconstriction in nonasthmatic subjects, and this effect is not explained by an increase in airway tone. In asthmatic subjects, pretreatment with pilocarpine increased Rrs by 31 +/- 8% and SO2 further increased Rrs to 88 +/- 17% above base line. SO2 alone gave a 60 +/- 18% increase in Rrs. Our results suggest that feedback inhibitory muscarinic receptors may be present on cholinergic nerves in normal airways and that there may be a dysfunction of this feedback mechanism in asthmatic airways. This might be contributory to exaggerated cholinergic reflex bronchoconstriction in asthma.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Muscarinic receptor signaling in the pathophysiology of asthma and COPD
Gosens, R., Zaagsma, J., Meurs, H., & Halayko, A. J. (2006) · Respiratory Research · doi:10.1186/1465-9921-7-73 · Cited by 409
Jacoby, D. B., Gleich, G. J., & Fryer, A. D. (1993) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci116331 · Cited by 339
Bronchopulmonary afferent nerves.
CARR, M. J., & UNDEM, B. J. (2003) · Respirology · doi:10.1046/j.1440-1843.2003.00473.x · Cited by 147
Metadata
- Authors
- Minette, P. A., Lammers, J. W., Dixon, C. M., McCusker, M. T., & Barnes, P. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1989-12-01
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2461-2465
- ISSN
- 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- OpenAlex
- W2254170473
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A muscarinic agonist inhibits reflex bronchoconstriction in normal but not in asthmatic subjects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jappl.1989.67.6.2461
- The paper
- Minette, P. A., Lammers, J. W., Dixon, C. M., McCusker, M. T., & Barnes, P. J. (1989). A muscarinic agonist inhibits reflex bronchoconstriction in normal but not in asthmatic subjects. Journal of Applied Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1989.67.6.2461
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.