The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Differences in cardiovascular adaptations to endurance exercise training between older men and women
Abstract
Recent studies have shown that people in their seventh decade are able to adapt to exercise training with an increase in maximal O2 uptake (VO2max) similar in relative magnitude to that observed in young people. The purpose of this study was to determine the relative contributions of increases in stroke volume and O2 extraction to the training-induced increase in VO2max in older men and women. Fifteen men [63 +/- 3 (SE) yr] and 16 women (64 +/- 3 yr), in good health, participated in 9–12 mo of endurance exercise training at 70 to 85% of maximal heart rate for 45 min/day, 4 days/wk. VO2max increased 19% (2.35 +/- 0.1 to 2.8 +/- 0.1 l/min; P < 0.01) in the men and 22% (1.36 +/- 0.1 to 1.66 +/- 0.1 l/min; P < 0.01) in the women in response to training. In the men, stroke volume during maximal exercise was 15% higher after training, and this increase accounted for 66% of the increase in VO2max. The remainder of the increase in VO2max was accounted for by a 7% greater arteriovenous O2 content difference during maximal exercise. In contrast, training resulted in no change in stroke volume in women, in whom the entire increase in VO2max was accounted for by a greater arteriovenous O2 content difference (12.2 +/- 0.4 before vs. 14.4 +/- 0.4 ml O2/100 ml blood after; P < 0.01) during maximal exercise. There were no changes in these variables in the control subjects. The mechanisms responsible for the training-induced increase in VO2max in the older men were similar to those found in young people.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Response to Exercise After Bed Rest and After Training.
(1969) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-71-2-444_1 · Cited by 914
Cited by
Exercise and Physical Activity for Older Adults
Chodzko-Zajko, W. J., Proctor, D. N., Fiatarone Singh, M. A., Minson, C. T., Nigg, C. R., Salem, G. J., & Skinner, J. S. (2009) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e3181a0c95c · Cited by 5,153
Medicine & science in sports & exercise
(1994) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(94)92575-5 · Cited by 1,303
ACSM Position Stand: Exercise and Physical Activity for Older Adults
Mazzeo, R. S., Cavanagh, P., Evans, W. J., Fiatarone, M., Hagberg, J., McAuley, E., & Startzell, J. (1998) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1097/00005768-199806000-00033 · Cited by 1,158
Paterson, D. H., & Warburton, D. E. (2010) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/1479-5868-7-38 · Cited by 953
Bouchard, C., An, P., Rice, T., Skinner, J. S., Wilmore, J. H., Gagnon, J., Pérusse, L., Leon, A. S., & Rao, D. C. (1999) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1999.87.3.1003 · Cited by 875
Metadata
- Authors
- Spina, R. J., Ogawa, T., Kohrt, W. M., Martin, W. H., Holloszy, J. O., & Ehsani, A. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1993-08-01
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 849-855
- ISSN
- 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- OpenAlex
- W2276189818
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differences in cardiovascular adaptations to endurance exercise training between older men and women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jappl.1993.75.2.849
- The paper
- Spina, R. J., Ogawa, T., Kohrt, W. M., Martin, W. H., Holloszy, J. O., & Ehsani, A. A. (1993). Differences in cardiovascular adaptations to endurance exercise training between older men and women. Journal of Applied Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1993.75.2.849
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.