The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measurement of the EMG-force relationship in a human upper airway muscle
Abstract
The upper airway muscles play an important role in breathing, swallowing, and speaking, but little is known about the electromyogram (EMG)-force relationship of these muscles. We have measured the peak integrated EMG activity (iEMG) and force of human nasal dilator muscles (NDM) with a custom-designed headpiece that was attached via the forehead and upper lip. The headpiece contains a micromanipulator that holds a rod with a load cell mounted on its tip. The reproducibility of the force measurements was examined by measuring the lateral or “flaring” force of the NDM in multiple trials on two separate occasions in 13 subjects. For these studies the subjects were instructed to perform maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs). Test-retest reproducibility averaged 8.3% (coefficient of variation) for within-day comparisons and 13.7% between days. We also measured iEMG and NDM force during an incremental exercise test in nine of the subjects; they were instructed to breathe nasally throughout one 30-s epoch at rest and at each workload. The iEMG and force during peak exercise (175–275 W) averaged 81 +/- 26% (SD) MVC and 235 +/- 127 mN (approximately 75% MVC), respectively. The iEMG during incremental exercise was linearly related to the peak force (r = 0.90, P < 0.001). Contractile properties were measured in seven of the subjects by application of single supramaximal shocks (0.1-ms pulse) to the facial nerve. Twitch force averaged 9 +/- 6% MVC, and the time to peak force was 62 +/- 13 ms, which is considerably faster than that in human diaphragm or elbow flexors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Our previous work has demonstrated that this method is highly reproducible and well understood by the subjects.”
From Endurance training of respiratory muscles improves cycling performance in fit young cyclists (2004) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Endurance training of respiratory muscles improves cycling performance in fit young cyclists
Holm, P., Sattler, A., & Fregosi, R. F. (2004) · BMC Physiology · doi:10.1186/1472-6793-4-9 · Cited by 96
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Fuller, D., Sullivan, J., Essif, E., Personius, K., & Fregosi, R. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1995-07-01
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 270-278
- ISSN
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurement of the EMG-force relationship in a human upper airway muscle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jappl.1995.79.1.270
- The paper
- Fuller, D., Sullivan, J., Essif, E., Personius, K., & Fregosi, R. F. (1995). Measurement of the EMG-force relationship in a human upper airway muscle. Journal of Applied Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1995.79.1.270
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.