The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Muscle inactivation: assessment of interpolated twitch technique
Abstract
Behm, D. G., D. M. M. St-Pierre, and D. Perez. Muscle inactivation: assessment of interpolated twitch technique. J. Appl. Physiol. 81(5): 2267–2273, 1996.—The validity, reliability, and protocol for the interpolated twitch technique (ITT) were investigated with isometric plantar flexor and leg extension contractions. Estimates of muscle inactivation were attempted by comparing a variety of superimposed with potentiated evoked torques with submaximal and maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) torques or forces. The use of nerve and surface stimulation to elicit ITT was reliable, except for problems in maintaining maximal stimulation with nerve stimulation at 20° plantar flexion and during leg extension. The interpolated twitch ratio-force relationship was best described by a shallow hyperbolic curve resulting in insignificant MVC prediction errors with second-order polynomials (1.1–6.9%). The prediction error under 40% MVC was approximately double that over 60% MVC, contributing to poor estimations of MVC in non-weight-bearing postimmobilized ankle fracture patients. There was no significant difference in the ITT sensitivity when twitches, doublets, or quintuplets were used. The ITT was valid and reliable when high-intensity contractions were analyzed with a second-order polynomial.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
Cited by
MacDonald, G. Z., Penney, M. D. H., Mullaley, M. E., Cuconato, A. L., Drake, C. D. J., Behm, D. G., & Button, D. C. (2013) · Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · doi:10.1519/jsc.0b013e31825c2bc1 · Cited by 411
Self-citationFoam Rolling as a Recovery Tool after an Intense Bout of Physical Activity
MacDonald, G. Z., Button, D. C., Drinkwater, E. J., & Behm, D. G. (2014) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e3182a123db · Cited by 275
Self-citationGreater neural adaptations following high- vs. low-load resistance training
Jenkins, N. D. M., Miramonti, A. A., Hill, E. C., Smith, C. M., Cochrane-Snyman, K. C., Housh, T. J., & Cramer, J. T. (2017) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2017.00331 · Cited by 197
Tillin, N. A., Pain, M. T. G., & Folland, J. P. (2011) · Muscle & Nerve · doi:10.1002/mus.21885 · Cited by 112
Maximal motor unit firing rates during isometric resistance training in men.
Pucci, A. R., Griffin, L., & Cafarelli, E. (2006) · Experimental Physiology · doi:10.1113/expphysiol.2005.032094 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Behm, D. G., St-Pierre, D. M. M., & Perez, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1996-11-01
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2267-2273
- ISSN
- 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- OpenAlex
- W2288566638
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Muscle inactivation: assessment of interpolated twitch technique. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jappl.1996.81.5.2267
- The paper
- Behm, D. G., St-Pierre, D. M. M., & Perez, D. (1996). Muscle inactivation: assessment of interpolated twitch technique. Journal of Applied Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1996.81.5.2267
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.