Effects of the ovarian cycle on sympathetic neural outflow during static exercise
Open accessAbstract
We compared reflex responses to static handgrip at 30% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) in 10 women (mean age 24.1 ± 1.7 yr) during two phases of their ovarian cycle: the menstrual phase ( days 1–4) and the follicular phase ( days 10–12). Changes in muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA; microneurography) in response to static exercise were greater during the menstrual compared with follicular phase (phase effect P = 0.01). Levels of estrogen were less during the menstrual phase (75 ± 5.5 vs. 116 ± 9.6 pg/ml, days 1–4 vs. days 10–12; P = 0.002). Generated tension did not explain differences in MSNA responses (MVC: 29.3 ± 1.3 vs. 28.2 ± 1.5 kg, days 1–4 vs. days 10–12; P = 0.13). In a group of experiments with the use of 31 P-NMR spectroscopy, no phase effect was observed for H+and[Formula: see text] concentrations ( n = 5). During an ischemic rhythmic handgrip paradigm (20% MVC), a phase effect was not observed for MSNA or H+or[Formula: see text] concentrations, suggesting that blood flow was necessary for the expression of the cycle-related effect. The present studies suggest that, during static handgrip exercise, MSNA is increased during the menstrual compared with the follicular phase of the ovarian cycle.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 62 · Cited by 125
- Authors
- Ettinger, S. M., Silber, D. H., Gray, K. S., Smith, M. B., Yang, Q. X., Kunselman, A. R., & Sinoway, L. I.
- Affiliations
- Section of Cardiology,
- Lebanon VA Medical Center (US)
- Department of Radiology, and
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1998-12-01
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2075-2081
- ISSN
- 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- OpenAlex
- W2259595795
- Semantic Scholar
- c780cd16e289ab22c454558a9bdb2ce76e870fec
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 3.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- American Heart Association
- National Institutes of Health (1f32hl009012-01, 5r29hl044667-02, 5r01ag012227-06)
- National Institute on Aging (R01-AG12227)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R29 HL-44667, F32-HL-09012)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
- Keywords
- ovarian cycle, menstrual cycle phases, follicular phase, muscle sympathetic nerve activity, static handgrip exercise, estrogen, blood flow, muscle acidosis, 31P NMR, women
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Estradiol, Estrone, Female, Follicular Phase, Humans, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Ischemia, Menstrual Cycle, Menstruation, Muscle Contraction, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Phosphoric Acids, Reflex, Sympathetic Nervous System, Exercise, Muscle, Skeletal, Hand Strength
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review