The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Oxygen sensing by the carotid body chemoreceptors
Abstract
Carotid bodies are sensory organs that detect changes in arterial blood oxygen, and the ensuing reflexes are critical for maintaining homeostasis during hypoxemia. During the past decade, tremendous progress has been made toward understanding the cellular mechanisms underlying oxygen sensing at the carotid body. The purpose of this minireview is to highlight some recent concepts on sensory transduction and transmission at the carotid body. A bulk of evidence suggests that glomus (type I) cells are the initial site of transduction and that they release transmitters in response to hypoxia, which causes depolarization of nearby afferent nerve endings, leading to an increase in sensory discharge. There are two main hypotheses to explain the transduction process that triggers transmitter release. One hypothesis assumes that a biochemical event associated with a heme protein triggers the transduction cascade. The other hypothesis suggests that a K+ channel protein is the oxygen sensor and that inhibition of this channel by hypoxia leading to depolarization is a seminal event in transduction. Although there is body of evidence supporting and questioning each of these, this review will try to point out that the truth lies somewhere in an interrelation between the two. Several transmitters have been identified in glomus cells, and they are released in response to hypoxia. However, their precise roles in sensory transmission remain uncertain. It is hoped that future studies involving transgenic animals with targeted disruption of genes encoding transmitters and their receptors may resolve some of the key issues surrounding the sensory transmission at the carotid body. Further studies are necessary to identify whether a single sensor or multiple oxygen sensors are needed for the transduction process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Structure of a voltage-dependent K+ channel β subunit
Gulbis, J. M., Mann, S., & MacKinnon, R. (1999) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80805-3 · Cited by 283
Cited by
Free Radicals in the Physiological Control of Cell Function
Dröge, W. (2002) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00018.2001 · Cited by 9,855
The NOX Family of ROS-Generating NADPH Oxidases: Physiology and Pathophysiology
Bedard, K., & Krause, K.-H. (2007) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00044.2005 · Cited by 6,989
Homeostasis, Inflammation, and Disease Susceptibility
Kotas, M. E., & Medzhitov, R. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.010 · Cited by 1,213
Gimenez-Roqueplo, A.-P., Favier, J., Rustin, P., Mourad, J.-J., Plouin, P.-F., Corvol, P., Rötig, A., & Jeunemaitre, X. (2001) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/324413 · Cited by 364
H 2 S mediates O 2 sensing in the carotid body
Peng, Y.-J., Nanduri, J., Raghuraman, G., Souvannakitti, D., Gadalla, M. M., Kumar, G. K., Snyder, S. H., & Prabhakar, N. R. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1005866107 · Cited by 361
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Prabhakar, N. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2000-06-01
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2287-2295
- ISSN
- 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- OpenAlex
- W2160176954
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oxygen sensing by the carotid body chemoreceptors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jappl.2000.88.6.2287
- The paper
- Prabhakar, N. R. (2000). Oxygen sensing by the carotid body chemoreceptors. Journal of Applied Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.2000.88.6.2287
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.