Physiology of a Microgravity Environment Invited Review: Microgravity and skeletal muscle
Open accessAbstract
Spaceflight (SF) has been shown to cause skeletal muscle atrophy; a loss in force and power; and, in the first few weeks, a preferential atrophy of extensors over flexors. The atrophy primarily results from a reduced protein synthesis that is likely triggered by the removal of the antigravity load. Contractile proteins are lost out of proportion to other cellular proteins, and the actin thin filament is lost disproportionately to the myosin thick filament. The decline in contractile protein explains the decrease in force per cross-sectional area, whereas the thin-filament loss may explain the observed postflight increase in the maximal velocity of shortening in the type I and IIa fiber types. Importantly, the microgravity-induced decline in peak power is partially offset by the increased fiber velocity. Muscle velocity is further increased by the microgravity-induced expression of fast-type myosin isozymes in slow fibers (hybrid I/II fibers) and by the increased expression of fast type II fiber types. SF increases the susceptibility of skeletal muscle to damage, with the actual damage elicited during postflight reloading. Evidence in rats indicates that SF increases fatigability and reduces the capacity for fat oxidation in skeletal muscles. Future studies will be required to establish the cellular and molecular mechanisms of the SF-induced muscle atrophy and functional loss and to develop effective exercise countermeasures.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The aforementioned factors may cause cumulative effects, which may account for the particularly steep slope portion in muscle strength.
“The aforementioned factors may cause cumulative effects (71, 72), which may account for the particularly steep slope portion in muscle strength (21, 93).”
From Nonuniform loss of muscle strength and atrophy during bed rest: a systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [72]
The Conclusions (page unavailable) describe both muscle atrophy and qualitative changes in contractile proteins that contribute to force loss. The Muscle force section (page unavailable) reports changes in strength over time, but does not attribute a particularly steep portion of a strength curve to cumulative effects of those factors. (LLM, conf=0.79)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMuscles are more or less apt to undergo atrophy in response to unloading or disuse depending on their topography and function.
“Second, dependent on their topography and function (21), muscles are more or less apt to undergo atrophy in response to unloading or disuse (71, 72).”
From Nonuniform loss of muscle strength and atrophy during bed rest: a systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [72]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 117 · Cited by 548
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Altered actin and myosin expression in muscle during exposure to microgravity D. B. Thomason et al., Journal of Applied Physiology, 1992 2. Elevated interstitial fluid volume in rat soleus muscles by hindlimb unweighting S. C. Kandarian et al., Journal of Applied Physiology, 1991 3. Reactive oxygen species upregulate expression of muscle atrophy-associated ubiquitin ligase Cbl-b in rat L6 skeletal muscle cells Takayuki Uchida et al., American Journal of Physiology -Cell Physiology, 2018 4. Skeletal muscle atrophy in response to 14 days of weightlessness: vastus medialis X. J. Musacchia et al., Journal of Applied Physiology, 1992 5. Skeletal muscle adaptations to microgravity exposure in the mouse B. C. Harrison et al., Journal of Applied Physiology,2003 · DOI
- Authors
- Fitts, R. H., Riley, D. R., & Widrick, J. J.
- Affiliations
- Marquette University (US)
- Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
- Oregon State University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2000-08-01
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 823-839
- ISSN
- 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- OpenAlex
- W2124496590
- Cited by
- 548
- References
- 117
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 2.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- e-Publications@Marquette (Marquette University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Keywords
- microgravity, skeletal muscle atrophy, spaceflight, muscle protein synthesis, contractile proteins, actin thin filaments, myosin thick filaments, muscle fiber type, muscle damage, fatigability, fat oxidation, exercise countermeasures
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Humans, Space Flight, Weightlessness, Muscle, Skeletal, Weightlessness Countermeasures, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review