Muscle volume, MRI relaxation times (T2), and body composition after spaceflight
Abstract
Postflight changes in muscle volume, calf muscle transverse relaxation time, and total body composition were measured in 4 crewmembers after a 17-day mission and in 14–16 crewmembers in multiple shuttle/Mir missions of 16- to 28-wk duration. During the 17-day mission, all muscle regions except the hamstrings significantly decreased 3–10% compared with baseline. During the shuttle/Mir missions, there were significant decreases in muscle volume (5–17%) in all muscle groups except the neck. These changes, which reached a new steady state by 4 mo of flight or less, were reversed within 30–60 days after landing. Postflight swelling and elevation of calf muscle transverse relaxation time persisted for several weeks after flight, which suggests possible muscle damage. In contrast to the 17-day flight, in which loss in fat, but not lean body mass, was found (25), losses in bone mineral content and lean body mass, but not fat, were seen after the longer shuttle/Mir missions. The percent losses in total body lean body mass and bone mineral content were similar at ∼3.4–3.5%, whereas the pelvis demonstrated the largest regional bone loss at 13%.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
BMD loss in the femoral neck has been modeled as a linear decrease of (1.06 ± 0.63)% per month.
“Specifically, BMD loss in the femoral neck has been modeled as a linear decrease: (1.06 ± 0.63)% BMD loss per month [17,18].”
From A human mission to Mars: Predicting the bone mineral density loss of astronauts (2020) · cites this paper as [17]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 370
- Authors
- LeBlanc, A., Lin, C., Shackelford, L., Sinitsyn, V., Evans, H., Belichenko, O., Schenkman, B., Kozlovskaya, I., Oganov, V., Bakulin, A., Hedrick, T., & Feeback, D.
- Affiliations
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- Johnson Space Center (US)
- Department of CT and MRI, Cardiology Research Center, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow, Russia; and
- Institute of Biomedical Problems (RU)
- ORCID
- Lin, Chen
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2000-12-01
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2158-2164
- ISSN
- 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- OpenAlex
- W2181034614
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 2.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Exploration and Technology
- Keywords
- spaceflight, muscle atrophy, muscle volume, T2 relaxation time, triceps surae, body composition, lean body mass, fat mass, bone mineral content, bone loss, post-flight recovery, muscle damage, microgravity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Body Composition, Edema, Humans, Leg, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Pelvic Bones, Space Flight, Time Factors, Bone Density, Muscle, Skeletal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review