Cited by 370Spaceflight effects on biologyMuscle Physiology and DisordersSpace Exploration and Technology

Muscle volume, MRI relaxation times (T2), and body composition after spaceflight

LeBlanc, Adrian, Lin, Chen, Shackelford, Linda, Sinitsyn, Valentine, Evans, Harlan, Belichenko, Oleg, Schenkman, Boris, Kozlovskaya, Inessa +4 more·2000·Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

Postflight changes in muscle volume, calf muscle transverse relaxation time, and total body composition were measured in 4 crewmembers after a 17-day mission and in 14–16 crewmembers in multiple shuttle/Mir missions of 16- to 28-wk duration. During the 17-day mission, all muscle regions except the hamstrings significantly decreased 3–10% compared with baseline. During the shuttle/Mir missions, there were significant decreases in muscle volume (5–17%) in all muscle groups except the neck. These changes, which reached a new steady state by 4 mo of flight or less, were reversed within 30–60 days after landing. Postflight swelling and elevation of calf muscle transverse relaxation time persisted for several weeks after flight, which suggests possible muscle damage. In contrast to the 17-day flight, in which loss in fat, but not lean body mass, was found (25), losses in bone mineral content and lean body mass, but not fat, were seen after the longer shuttle/Mir missions. The percent losses in total body lean body mass and bone mineral content were similar at ∼3.4–3.5%, whereas the pelvis demonstrated the largest regional bone loss at 13%.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jappl.2000.89.6.2158

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 370

Authors
LeBlanc, A., Lin, C., Shackelford, L., Sinitsyn, V., Evans, H., Belichenko, O., Schenkman, B., Kozlovskaya, I., Oganov, V., Bakulin, A., Hedrick, T., & Feeback, D.
Affiliations
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • Johnson Space Center (US)
  • Department of CT and MRI, Cardiology Research Center, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow, Russia; and
  • Institute of Biomedical Problems (RU)
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2000-12-01
Volume
89
Issue
6
Pages
2158-2164
ISSN
  • 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
OpenAlex
W2181034614
Cited by
370
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 13
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Exploration and Technology
Keywords
spaceflight, muscle atrophy, muscle volume, T2 relaxation time, triceps surae, body composition, lean body mass, fat mass, bone mineral content, bone loss, post-flight recovery, muscle damage, microgravity
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Composition, Edema, Humans, Leg, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Pelvic Bones, Space Flight, Time Factors, Bone Density, Muscle, Skeletal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review