Cited by 138Muscle metabolism and nutritionSports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Gender differences in carbohydrate loading are related to energy intake

Tarnopolsky, Mark A., Zawada, Carol, Richmond, Lindsay B., Carter, Sherry, Shearer, Jane, Graham, Terry, Phillips, Stuart M.·2001·Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

We demonstrated that female endurance athletes did not increase their muscle glycogen concentration after an increase in the dietary carbohydrate intake (58 → 74%), whereas men did (Tarnopolsky MA, SA Atkinson, SM Phillips, and JD McDougall, J Appl Physiol 78: 1360–1368, 1995). This may have been related to a lower energy or carbohydrate intake by the women or due to an inherent gender difference in glycogen storage capacity. We examined whether well-trained men ( n = 6) and women ( n = 6) increased muscle glycogen concentration after an increase in both the relative (58 → 75%) and absolute energy and carbohydrate intake and whether potential gender differences were related to muscle hexokinase enzyme activity. Subjects were randomly allocated to three diets [Hab, habitual; CHO, high carbohydrate (75%); and CHO + E, extra energy + CHO (↑∼34%)] for a 4-day period before a muscle biopsy for analysis of total and pro- and macroglycogen and hexokinase activity. Total glycogen concentration was higher for the men on the CHO and CHO + E trials compared with Hab ( P < 0.05), whereas women increased only on the CHO + E trial compared with Hab ( P < 0.05). There were no gender differences in the proportion of pro- and macroglycogen or hexokinase activity. A low energy intake may explain the previously reported lower capacity for women to glycogen load compared with men.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jappl.2001.91.1.225

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although lower muscle glycogen storage in the mid-follicular phase appears to be overcome by CHO loading, the greater intramuscular glycogen concentrations failed to translate into improved time trial performance.

    “Although the lower level of muscle glycogen storage in the mid-follicular phase of the menstrual cycle appears to be overcome by CHO loading, the greater intramuscular glycogen concentrations failed to translate into improved time trial performance [182,184].”
  • Carbohydrate loading at 8.4-9.0 g/kg body weight/day increases resting muscle glycogen concentration in the mid-follicular phase of the menstrual cycle.

    “carbohydrate loading (8.4–9.0 g.kg body weight−1.d−1) has been shown to increase resting muscle glycogen concentration in the mid-follicular (MF) phase of the menstrual cycle [184,185].”
  • In female subjects, substantial enhancement of muscle glycogen storage is associated with increased dietary CHO intake only after total energy intake is also increased.

    “In the latter study, female subjects showed a substantial enhancement of muscle glycogen storage associated with increased dietary CHO intake only after total energy intake was also increased (104).”

    From Postexercise muscle glycogen resynthesis in humans. (2017) · cites this paper as [104]

  • The relationship between dietary CHO and glycogen storage is underpinned by total energy intake.

    “Indeed, there is evidence that the relationship between dietary CHO and glycogen storage is underpinned by total energy intake.”

    From Postexercise muscle glycogen resynthesis in humans. (2017) · cites this paper as [104]

  • The lower effectiveness of glycogen super-compensation in female athletes is an outcome of relatively lower energy intake in the female cohort.

    “but this finding was later reinterpreted as an outcome of the relatively lower energy intake in the female cohort (104).”

    From Postexercise muscle glycogen resynthesis in humans. (2017) · cites this paper as [104]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 138

Authors
Tarnopolsky, M. A., Zawada, C., Richmond, L. B., Carter, S., Shearer, J., Graham, T., & Phillips, S. M.
Affiliations
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • Departments of Medicine (Neurology and Rehabilitation) and
  • University of Guelph (CA)
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2001-07-01
Volume
91
Issue
1
Pages
225-230
ISSN
  • 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
OpenAlex
W2185455343
Cited by
138
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
carbohydrate loading, gender differences, muscle glycogen, energy intake, carbohydrate intake, hexokinase activity, endurance athletes
MeSH terms
Adult, Energy Intake, Diet, Dietary Carbohydrates, Double-Blind Method, Female, Glycogen, Hexokinase, Humans, Male, Sex Characteristics, Muscle, Skeletal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review